Howdy,
I think I am probably going to be worrying about the same thing in the not too distant future.
My radiator is original in that it was originally came with my 55 F-600 when it had a 6-cyl engine installed. I got it with a 239 Y and later found a 272 from a 59 F100 and rebuilt it.
I am not using the "High Mount" pump and fan position opting for either a set of electric fans or a much bigger clutch fan.
The radiator I mentioned I took to a radiator shop in Tacoma, Wa and had them completely rebuild it removing the 3-row core and replacing it with a 4-row core.
My water pump is the (non high mount) pickup type pump and I'll likely be building a shroud to match up with it if I stay with the belt driven, water pump mounted fan.
Here's where I am on your problem.
I do not think 3000 CFM is enough for an F250/350 pulling any sort of load.
And since the F-600 is a "load" all itself, I am thinking that if I do go with electrics it will have to be something similar to Flex-A-Lite's 6000CFM fan system for the Superduty F-250/350 diesels. like below.
Flex-A-Lite 6000 CFM I am a little suspect of the fan marketeers that claim you save all sorts of HP by using electrics but they don't really save all that much over a good clutch fan since the clutch is disengaged most of the time.
When the electric fan is running, it still must be driven by the alternator/generator.
Electric fan manufacturers claim you can save up to 27hp . Now granted, if a big belt driven fan is running at max engine RPM it might very well require 27hp to turn it (at that RPM)
But you're getting a commensurate amount of CFM from that fan too.
(I don't think a Y-block fan requires that amount of HP to turn it though) I suppose an enterprising engine rebuilder could dyno test an engine with a fan and without and put that to bed!
But even the 6000CFM fans running at high RPM are requiring a fair amount of current (48A, from the ALT/GEN)
48A @14V produces 672W of power. 1hp = 746W So those fans get around 1hp from the engine (via the ALT/GEN)
If roughly 1HP produces 6000CFM, then the engine driven fan must be producing more CFM (A LOT MORE) And yes, I know the elecrtic fans are better designed fans more efficient blade design yada yada. But they're not "that" much better!
It's not a problem with a car or a pickup someone drives around empty most of the time. But with a Medium duty truck like your 58 F-600 or my 55 F-600.... if we load them up even a little, the CFM requirements for the radiator ramp up sharply.
No automotive electrical system is capable of producing that level of current for any longer than it takes to crank en engine . I.E. the starter in my 2005 F-350 SD Diesel might briefly (initially) draw 1000A of current during cranking but the alternator will never produce more than about 150A or so during normal operations.
So I am thinking I might stay away from electrics for mine because under load, they may not move enough air. And with an A/C condenser in front of the radiator, it'll need even more air flow.
For your truck, I am thinking that you might have to double your CFM (or go back to a belt driven fan) to reduce the overheating. I don't think a 3000CFM fan is going to be adequate for anything other than "straight & level flying" (no headwind)
Regards,
Rick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1955 F-600/272/E4OD// Disclaimer: No animals were injured while test driving my F-600 except the ones I ran over intentionally!
---------------------
This post was created using OpenSuSE Linux x64 and Firefox