Profile Picture

Front End Alignment with Radials

Posted By oldcarmark 2 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
KULTULZ
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.9K, Visits: 306.4K
Nothing wrong with a straight axle. Actually, there are many ways to improve on the design.

I didn't want to go too far on the subject as it not within the theme of this forum.

But how a person wants an older application to conform and ride/handle to modern specs is a personal choice as to how the car is used and how far you want to make alterations.

Radial Tuning is a complex subject, especially for a fifties/sixties car.


____________________________

FORD DEARBORN
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)Supercharged (1.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 821, Visits: 113.5K
Gives me something to think about too. Everything I wanted to know about modern tires on our classic vehicles but didn't know how to ask. My truck has a straight axle but I don't think that's all bad. Later I'd like to ask some questions regarding leaf springs.  Thanks for the link....

64F100 57FAIRLANE500
KULTULZ
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.9K, Visits: 306.4K



____________________________

Dave V
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 237, Visits: 41.6K
Very interesting. Gives me something to think about.

SE Wis
KULTULZ
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.9K, Visits: 306.4K
Dave V (5/21/2026)


I do have an idea on how to modify the mount but now after seeing that adjustable upper control arm it would give more adjustability. 


That control arm shown is for a circle or road race application ($$$). I just used it as an example.

If I had a 55/56, I would modify the upper control arm mounting bracket to simulate how the later MUST II adjustment method was done if not wanting to go full MUST II changeover with rack. That design used no shims - 

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/e211ac22-e280-444f-88dc-4946.jpg

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/9bb6be38-0ed2-4e60-8590-c959.png

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/cfe672a8-b148-4ef9-87b9-a7f1.png


SEE WHAT YOU THINK -

You would retain your original control arms saving big bucks and make the front end completely adjustable.

You would have to use more durable bushings.



____________________________

Dave V
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 237, Visits: 41.6K
I do have an idea on how to modify the mount but now after seeing that adjustable upper control arm it would give more adjustability. 

SE Wis
KULTULZ
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.9K, Visits: 306.4K
FORD went to radial tires (optional) on the 1967 year model run. Front end design was changed at that point to accept adjustments necessary for the radial tire, also known as RADIAL TUNED.

Previous model years cannot accept the needed radial tire CASTER figures as the now needed adjustment range was not necessary.

Excessive shim packs are dangerous and prone to fall out. 

The only alternatives (IMO) is either re-designed the control arm mount or going to an adjustable control arm.

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/aa066bb9-79aa-4335-85c0-9fb1.jpg




____________________________

Dave V
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)Supercharged (465 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 8 hours ago
Posts: 237, Visits: 41.6K
I've also been trying to figure out how to obtain more positive caster on my 56 Victoria. Using an angle finder it looks like the upper control arm would need to be moved rearward about 1/2" to gain about 3 degrees or 1" for 6 degrees. Any suggestions 

SE Wis
KULTULZ
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)Supercharged (4.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.9K, Visits: 306.4K
SEE IF THIS HELPS EXPLAIN IT - 

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/523f92c8-4743-420c-9f72-cbf5.jpg







____________________________

MoonShadow
Posted Last Month
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)Supercharged (7.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 4.6K, Visits: 39.1K
I think that is what I was looking for. Thank you.

Y's guys rule!
Looking for McCullouch VS57 brackets and parts. Also looking for 28 Chrysler series 72 parts. And early Hemi parts.

MoonShadow, 292 w/McCulloch, 28 Chrysler Roadster, 354 Hemi)
Manchester, New Hampshire


Reading This Topic


Site Meter