Brent. I have no info on the dimples in the 5752 / 113 combustion chambers. All the 113s I've seen have the dimples. Notice how there seems to be less shrouding of the intake and exhaust valves in the 113 chambers than what you see in the ECZ-G chambers. In my last entry I mentioned how historically y-blockers', including myself, thought the G heads used on '57 Fords and '58 Mercs were THE thing to have on their build. Today, I'd rather have a set of 113s!
Yes! The G heads have smaller combustion chambers offering a higher static compression ratio, BUT the 113s, as cast, have less valve shrouding and ALL 113s are posted! Need a smaller combustion chamber to accomplish a higher static compression ratio? Have the machine shop mill the heads!
The link below details a very street-able build that Ted Eaton did on a 292 block for Karol Miller. Ted used a .070 overbore (yielding a 3.820 bore) on a 292 block, a stock 3.3 stroke, 113 heads, '56 Ford 1.54:1 rocker arms, flat top pistons, and a custom Isky grind camshaft with a dual pattern grind using a 110 degree lobe center angle. End result? 303 cubic inches producing a peak of 315 horsepower, and 335 ft. lbs. of torque @ 3,300 rpm! This shakes out to just over 1 horsepower per cubic inch of engine displacement! Substitute a 312 crank and connecting rods and the hp and torque numbers will go up with the ~317 cubic inches of displacement.
http://www.eatonbalancing.com/2015/05/01/unported-iron-heads-can-still-make-over-a-hp-to-the-cubic-inch/
NoShortcuts
a.k.a. Charlie Brown
near Syracuse, New York