Author
|
Message
|
Park Olson
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 8 Years Ago
Posts: 102,
Visits: 1.9K
|
My '56-'57 book shows TAAA 7515B for '56 and B7C 7515A for '57,,,,,10 5/8 and 11 1/4 approx. length respectively
|
|
|
charliemccraney
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Active: 5 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 441.2K
|
Cool! So it looks like '54-'56 and '57-'64 are different.
Lawrenceville, GA
|
|
|
lyonroad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 703,
Visits: 3.1K
|
Rono (1/17/2014) So would car clutch forks have a different ratio and if so, why?
RonoI agree with Horvaths. Probably for increased leverage. Some trucks had 10.5", 11" and 12" clutches (pressure plate springs were different). Also cars had the big helper spring on the pedal while trucks had the through the floor thigh-master style pedal.
Mark
1956 Mercury M100 1955 Ford Fairlane Club Sedan Delta, British Columbia
|
|
|
The Horvaths
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 11 Years Ago
Posts: 96,
Visits: 1.3K
|
Same casting as mine but I measured with a rule and one eye.
|
|
|
lyonroad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 703,
Visits: 3.1K
|
charliemccraney (1/18/2014) See how it compares to the dimensions we've posted and the number on it.The number is TAAA-7515B. Dimensions are 5 3/4" x 3 3/8". I measured with set of dividers. The fork is from a '56 Mercury M100 witha 272, 11" clutch and a light duty 3 speed trans. Hope this helps
Mark
1956 Mercury M100 1955 Ford Fairlane Club Sedan Delta, British Columbia
|
|
|
slick56
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 460,
Visits: 4.5K
|
This is from a bellhousing off a B9 block with hydraulic clutch. I do not know if that would make a difference to the pivot point. I also do not know how big the truck was.  From pivot point to throwout bearing c/l is approx 3-1/4" From pivot point to clutch rod c/l is approx 6-1/4"  Part no. is TAAK-7515-B .
South Australia
|
|
|
charliemccraney
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Active: 5 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 441.2K
|
See how it compares to the dimensions we've posted and the number on it.
Lawrenceville, GA
|
|
|
lyonroad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 703,
Visits: 3.1K
|
Charlie, I have a '56 clutch fork (at least it came in a "56) in the back shed. I can look at it tomorrow. What would you like me to check?
Mark
1956 Mercury M100 1955 Ford Fairlane Club Sedan Delta, British Columbia
|
|
|
charliemccraney
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Active: 5 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 441.2K
|
I looked in my'57-'66 Truck parts catalog and any of those trucks with a Y would have used the same fork, part number B8C-7515-A (The numbers we gave above are engineering numbers), about 11" long, which matches my spare. I wonder if the other fork is '54-'56?
Lawrenceville, GA
|
|
|
The Horvaths
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 11 Years Ago
Posts: 96,
Visits: 1.3K
|
I reason (aloud) that, for a given transmission/bell housing, the distance from pivot to throw out will be the same. Then the distance from pivot to rod could be varied. This would cause a change in rod (pedal) travel, and a change in foot pressure required to overcome a given set of springs in the pressure plate.
|
|
|