Author
|
Message
|
YBLOCKMERC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 4 Months Ago
Posts: 194,
Visits: 19.5K
|
The Continental MK II was discontinued at the end of '57 and the Continental became the top of the line Lincoln. All Lincoln's in '58 were built on the same new unibody, so the increased Continental sales would reflect a lower price and the desire for Lincoln buyers to buy the top shelf model.
Marc
|
|
|
Hoosier Hurricane
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 321.5K
|
In '58 we were in the midst of a recession. Probably why Rambler (small, inexpensive cars) increased in sales, can't explain the Continental.
John - "The Hoosier Hurricane"
|
|
|
glrbird
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 612,
Visits: 6.5K
|
What was going on in 1958, most sales were down except Rambler and continental!
Gary Ryan San Antonio.TX.
|
|
|
John Mummert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Months Ago
Posts: 911,
Visits: 7.4K
|
Thanks, JIm. So, 76 out of every 100 people who bought new cars in 1957 didn't buy a scrub. These numbers also don't include Volkswagen, Fiat, MG, Triumph, Porsche, a handful of Toyotas and our neighbor even had a pair of Issetta's back then. So the number of misguided individuals who didn't have the foresight to buy an icon is even higher. I do remember going to visit a great uncle who just bought a new 57 bel air he was quite proud of. Even at 6 years old I thought it was the ugliest car I had ever seen. Until I saw the 58's.
http://ford-y-block.com 20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico
|
|
|
jrw429
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 5 Years Ago
Posts: 124,
Visits: 4.3K
|
John Mummert (11/1/2013) Maybe someone with more time than I have could look up production numbers for 55-56-57.Here is 54-59, because it is easy to cut and paste from wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Automobile_Production_FiguresFor 1957, 26.7% of American car production was Ford and 24.0% was Chevrolet. Production Figures for 1954 | | Production Figures for 1955 | | Production Figures for 1956 |
---|
Ford | 1,165,942 | | Chevrolet | 1,704,667 | | Chevrolet | 1,567,117 | Chevrolet | 1,143,561 | | Ford | 1,451,157 | | Ford | 1,408,478 | Plymouth | 463,148 | | Buick | 738,814 | | Buick | 572,024 | Buick | 444,609 | | Plymouth | 705,455 | | Plymouth | 571,634 | Oldsmobile | 354,001 | | Oldsmobile | 583,179 | | Oldsmobile | 485,458 | Pontiac | 287,744 | | Pontiac | 554,090 | | Pontiac | 405,730 | Mercury | 259,305 | | Mercury | 329,808 | | Mercury | 327,943 | Dodge | 154,648 | | Dodge | 276,936 | | Dodge | 240,686 | Chrysler | 105,030 | | Chrysler | 152,777 | | Cadillac | 154,577 | Cadillac | 96,680 | | Cadillac | 140,777 | | Chrysler | 128,322 | Nash | 91,121 | | Studebaker | 116,333 | | DeSoto | 109,442 | DeSoto | 76,580 | | DeSoto | 115,485 | | Nash | 83,420 | Studebaker | 68,708 | | Nash | 96,156 | | Studebaker | 69,593 | Hudson | 50,660 | | Packard | 55,247 | | Lincoln | 50,322 | Lincoln | 36,993 | | Hudson | 45,535 | | Hudson | 22,588 | Packard | 31,291 | | Lincoln | 27,222 | | Clipper | 18,482 | Metropolitan | 13,162 | | Imperial | 11,432 | | Imperial | 10,684 | Willys | 11,856 | | Willys | 6,565 | | Packard | 10,353 | Kaiser | 8,539 | | Metropolitan | 6,096 | | Metropolitan | 9,068 | Henry J | 1,123 | | Kaiser | 1,291 | | Continental | 2,550 | Production Figures for 1957 | | Production Figures for 1958 | | Production Figures for 1959 |
---|
Ford | 1,676,449 | | Chevrolet | 1,142,460 | | Chevrolet | 1,462,140 | Chevrolet | 1,505,910 | | Ford | 987,945 | | Ford | 1,450,953 | Plymouth | 726,009 | | Plymouth | 443,799 | | Plymouth | 458,261 | Buick | 405,086 | | Oldsmobile | 294,374 | | Pontiac | 383,320 | Oldsmobile | 384,390 | | Buick | 241,892 | | Oldsmobile | 382,865 | Pontiac | 334,041 | | Pontiac | 217,303 | | Rambler | 374,240 | Dodge | 287,608 | | Rambler | 162,182 | | Buick | 285,089 | Mercury | 286,163 | | Dodge | 137,861 | | Dodge | 156,385 | Cadillac | 146,841 | | Mercury | 133,271 | | Mercury | 150,000 | DeSoto | 126,514 | | Cadillac | 121,778 | | Cadillac | 142,272 | Chrysler | 122,273 | | Chrysler | 63,681 | | Studebaker | 126,156 | Rambler | 91,469 | | Edsel | 63,110 | | Chrysler | 69,970 | Studebaker | 63,101 | | DeSoto | 49,445 | | DeSoto | 45,734 | Lincoln | 41,123 | | Studebaker | 44,759 | | Edsel | 44,891 | Imperial | 37,593 | | Lincoln | 17,134 | | Lincoln/Continental | 26,906 | Metropolitan | 15,317 | | Imperial | 16,133 | | Metropolitan | 22,209 | Nash | 10,330 | | Metropolitan | 13,128 | | Imperial | 17,269 | Packard | 4,809 | | Continental | 12,550 | | Checker | 1,050 | Hudson | 4,180 | | Packard | 2,622 | | | | Continental | 462 | | | | | | | |
Jim - Erie Colorado, 1957 Country Sedan
|
|
|
pegleg
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 3.0K,
Visits: 8.7K
|
I get the same response with the '57. I really enjoy the Pure stock Drag Races, most of the audience has never seen a '57, let alone an F code. I get a lot of questions, and many are from guys wearing some kind of a GM shirt. They are astounded that any '57 is a match for GTO's and SS's that are ten years newer and 100 ci's smaller than their favorite brand whatever. The same thing applies to the R2 and R4 Studebakers that Ted Harbit or George Krem own. They've never heard of those cars, which is what makes it fun.
Frank/RebopBristol, In ( by Elkhart) 
|
|
|
DryLakesRacer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 340.0K
|
John from the facts as I know them there were indeed more FOMOCOs but IMO because the "C" brand never changed there basic engine more had an opportunity to live on. I've had a few of them and when they recieved the same non-care as a Ford they were just as gummed up.
Today it's just different. As you know you can buy almost everything for a tri5C including frames and bodies. The difference I see is when I take my 56 Victoria to a cruise there are more folks with rememberance stories than for the others. Rarely has anyone said anything bad most wishing they had them back. Whether they be modified or stock when you are the only one and there are 10 of the others you get the attention even if you don't want it....Also many offers $$$$................JD
56 Vic, B'Ville 200 MPH Club Member, So Cal.
|
|
|
ecode ragtop
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 4 Years Ago
Posts: 285,
Visits: 3.4K
|
O.K. Guys I can use a little help, there was an article in a car mag. in 57 that shows the building of the 57 Ford that Smokey Yunik built for Curtis Turner to run at Darlington. I have part of it but have lost the rest and there is no name of the mag. on any of the pages. Has any seen this article? Thanks Tom
JUST A MIDNIGHT CRUISE DOWN THUNDER ROAD!!! TOM DRUMMOND MIDWEST DIRECTOR 57 FORD INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
John Mummert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Months Ago
Posts: 911,
Visits: 7.4K
|
Sometime in 1957 Hotrod Mag did a whole article on Jerry Unser's 57 stockcar. It has pictures of the dual shock set-up. I have the issue somewhere, but like Frank, I don't know where I left it.I would guess it was later in the year, after Jerry won Pikes Peak. How in the world did a Ford beat those fabulous 57 scrubs????? From the articles you see today you'd think scrub was the only car company in the late 50's. Maybe someone with more time than I have could look up production numbers for 55-56-57. The point is, in 1957 about 85 out of every 100 people who bought a new car DIDN'T buy a scrub. That's a bit of a guess. The accurate numbers would be interesting.
http://ford-y-block.com 20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico
|
|
|
ecode ragtop
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 4 Years Ago
Posts: 285,
Visits: 3.4K
|
P.F.There was an organization in Indy called the Society of Autosports,Fellowship and Education or (S.A,F.E.) for short. Don Oldenberg was the S.A,F.E. Convert. champ in 1955 . Bill France merged SAFE and NASCAR in 1956 creating the NASCAR ragtop Division
JUST A MIDNIGHT CRUISE DOWN THUNDER ROAD!!! TOM DRUMMOND MIDWEST DIRECTOR 57 FORD INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|