|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 7 Years Ago
Posts: 124,
Visits: 4.3K
|
John Mummert (11/1/2013) Maybe someone with more time than I have could look up production numbers for 55-56-57.Here is 54-59, because it is easy to cut and paste from wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Automobile_Production_FiguresFor 1957, 26.7% of American car production was Ford and 24.0% was Chevrolet. | Production Figures for 1954 | | Production Figures for 1955 | | Production Figures for 1956 |
|---|
| Ford | 1,165,942 | | Chevrolet | 1,704,667 | | Chevrolet | 1,567,117 | | Chevrolet | 1,143,561 | | Ford | 1,451,157 | | Ford | 1,408,478 | | Plymouth | 463,148 | | Buick | 738,814 | | Buick | 572,024 | | Buick | 444,609 | | Plymouth | 705,455 | | Plymouth | 571,634 | | Oldsmobile | 354,001 | | Oldsmobile | 583,179 | | Oldsmobile | 485,458 | | Pontiac | 287,744 | | Pontiac | 554,090 | | Pontiac | 405,730 | | Mercury | 259,305 | | Mercury | 329,808 | | Mercury | 327,943 | | Dodge | 154,648 | | Dodge | 276,936 | | Dodge | 240,686 | | Chrysler | 105,030 | | Chrysler | 152,777 | | Cadillac | 154,577 | | Cadillac | 96,680 | | Cadillac | 140,777 | | Chrysler | 128,322 | | Nash | 91,121 | | Studebaker | 116,333 | | DeSoto | 109,442 | | DeSoto | 76,580 | | DeSoto | 115,485 | | Nash | 83,420 | | Studebaker | 68,708 | | Nash | 96,156 | | Studebaker | 69,593 | | Hudson | 50,660 | | Packard | 55,247 | | Lincoln | 50,322 | | Lincoln | 36,993 | | Hudson | 45,535 | | Hudson | 22,588 | | Packard | 31,291 | | Lincoln | 27,222 | | Clipper | 18,482 | | Metropolitan | 13,162 | | Imperial | 11,432 | | Imperial | 10,684 | | Willys | 11,856 | | Willys | 6,565 | | Packard | 10,353 | | Kaiser | 8,539 | | Metropolitan | 6,096 | | Metropolitan | 9,068 | | Henry J | 1,123 | | Kaiser | 1,291 | | Continental | 2,550 | | Production Figures for 1957 | | Production Figures for 1958 | | Production Figures for 1959 |
|---|
| Ford | 1,676,449 | | Chevrolet | 1,142,460 | | Chevrolet | 1,462,140 | | Chevrolet | 1,505,910 | | Ford | 987,945 | | Ford | 1,450,953 | | Plymouth | 726,009 | | Plymouth | 443,799 | | Plymouth | 458,261 | | Buick | 405,086 | | Oldsmobile | 294,374 | | Pontiac | 383,320 | | Oldsmobile | 384,390 | | Buick | 241,892 | | Oldsmobile | 382,865 | | Pontiac | 334,041 | | Pontiac | 217,303 | | Rambler | 374,240 | | Dodge | 287,608 | | Rambler | 162,182 | | Buick | 285,089 | | Mercury | 286,163 | | Dodge | 137,861 | | Dodge | 156,385 | | Cadillac | 146,841 | | Mercury | 133,271 | | Mercury | 150,000 | | DeSoto | 126,514 | | Cadillac | 121,778 | | Cadillac | 142,272 | | Chrysler | 122,273 | | Chrysler | 63,681 | | Studebaker | 126,156 | | Rambler | 91,469 | | Edsel | 63,110 | | Chrysler | 69,970 | | Studebaker | 63,101 | | DeSoto | 49,445 | | DeSoto | 45,734 | | Lincoln | 41,123 | | Studebaker | 44,759 | | Edsel | 44,891 | | Imperial | 37,593 | | Lincoln | 17,134 | | Lincoln/Continental | 26,906 | | Metropolitan | 15,317 | | Imperial | 16,133 | | Metropolitan | 22,209 | | Nash | 10,330 | | Metropolitan | 13,128 | | Imperial | 17,269 | | Packard | 4,809 | | Continental | 12,550 | | Checker | 1,050 | | Hudson | 4,180 | | Packard | 2,622 | | | | | Continental | 462 | | | | | | | |
Jim - Erie Colorado, 1957 Country Sedan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Week
Posts: 917,
Visits: 7.5K
|
Thanks, JIm. So, 76 out of every 100 people who bought new cars in 1957 didn't buy a scrub. These numbers also don't include Volkswagen, Fiat, MG, Triumph, Porsche, a handful of Toyotas and our neighbor even had a pair of Issetta's back then. So the number of misguided individuals who didn't have the foresight to buy an icon is even higher. I do remember going to visit a great uncle who just bought a new 57 bel air he was quite proud of. Even at 6 years old I thought it was the ugliest car I had ever seen. Until I saw the 58's.
http://ford-y-block.com 20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico 
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 616,
Visits: 7.1K
|
What was going on in 1958, most sales were down except Rambler and continental!
Gary Ryan San Antonio.TX.
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Active: 3 hours ago
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 323.3K
|
In '58 we were in the midst of a recession. Probably why Rambler (small, inexpensive cars) increased in sales, can't explain the Continental.
John - "The Hoosier Hurricane"

|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 194,
Visits: 20.6K
|
The Continental MK II was discontinued at the end of '57 and the Continental became the top of the line Lincoln. All Lincoln's in '58 were built on the same new unibody, so the increased Continental sales would reflect a lower price and the desire for Lincoln buyers to buy the top shelf model.
Marc
|