Author
|
Message
|
flathead_jr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 52,
Visits: 114
|
Ok, so here's the information I have been given , for either a 312, or 292 the block numbers are ECZ-6015A or ECZ-6015C. I think I have the one with the C. Now here's what I have been told that indicates a 312, on the crank flang there will either be a indentation with nothing, 292, or a indentation with a bump or something of the sort, 312, right? I am going to try and post a photo that has the indicator, and let me know if I am right.
|
|
|
Oldmics
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 5 Years Ago
Posts: 710,
Visits: 78.1K
|
Its a 312  Cant really go by any of the block numbers-only the crank. Oldmics
|
|
|
mctim64
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Years Ago
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 5.0K
|
Oldmics (7/31/2010)
Its a 312  Cant really go by any of the block numbers-only the crank. Oldmics Yep!
God Bless. Tim http://yblockguy.com/
350ci Y-Block FED "Elwood", 301ci Y-Block Unibody LSR "Jake", 312ci Y-Block '58 F-100, 338ci Y-Block powered Model A Tudor
tim@yblockguy.com Visalia, California Just west of the Sequoias
|
|
|
flathead_jr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 52,
Visits: 114
|
Yeah I know the block number don't really mean anything, they just give a 50/50 chance. However I was curious to know if what I pictured in the attachment was correct for a 312. I know it is kind of hard to see, but it was dark, and in a close tight area as the engine is sitting on the ground inside, and I had to use a mirror to see it. Is it a correct mark for a 312?
|
|
|
Nick Brann
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 13 Years Ago
Posts: 166,
Visits: 1.9K
|
Hi, If you go to John Mummert's site, it will show you the proper marking for a 312 crank. I can't tell from your picture, sorry. His site is http://ford-y-block.com and there is lots of useful information there. Good luck, Nick Brann - K.C., MO
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
You are looking for a 5/16” dot on the outer edge of the rear crankshaft flange to positively identify the cranshaft as one from a 312. That dot is just about the width of the rear crankshaft flange. A dot that is ¼” or less in size or multiple dots will indicate a 3.3” stroke or 292 crankshaft. No dot being present can point you to either a 292 or a 312. Getting back to the blocks, ECZ on the main caps is a resonably good indicator of a 312 engine.
If the crankshaft is at a point where you can see the #1 throw, then look at the lightening hole in that journal. A 15/16” diameter hole will be a 292 crankshaft while a ¾” hole will be a 312.
Here are some past threads on identifying 312 crankshafts but for the most part reitterates what I just mentioned.
http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/Topic14196.aspx http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/Topic19085.aspx
 Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|
aussiebill
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 5 Years Ago
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 11.4K
|
Ted (8/2/2010)
You are looking for a 5/16” dot on the outer edge of the rear crankshaft flange to positively identify the cranshaft as one from a 312. That dot is just about the width of the rear crankshaft flange. A dot that is ¼” or less in size or multiple dots will indicate a 3.3” stroke or 292 crankshaft. No dot being present can point you to either a 292 or a 312. Ted, you raised the point i was going to make re the dot system, yes the 312 does have a 5/16" flat dot but not to confuse it with Smaller raised dot, I,ve even had cranks with 2 raised dots, one slightly smaller than the other and have allways wondered their application. Your info now clears this up. Thank you. regards bill.
AussieBill YYYY Forever Y Block YYYY Down Under, Australia
|
|
|
flathead_jr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 52,
Visits: 114
|
Okay, so I came up with a different idea, since I didn't feel like pulling apart my engine to see which is which, obviously I could take a 292 that I know is a 292 and bring one cylinder to the bottom of it's stoke and measure it. My suspect 312 I did the same thing and when you measure through the spark plug hole, the suspect 312 came up an 1/8 to a 1/4 inch deeper than the 292. The stroke of a 292 is 3.30, and the 312 is 3.44, so wouldn't the deeper measurement indicate 312?
|
|
|
charliemccraney
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Active: 9 hours ago
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 441.2K
|
I think you have a 312. Doing some basic trig, the 312 when measured through the spark plug hole should be about .131" deeper. That's just over 1/8" (.125")
Lawrenceville, GA
|
|
|
flathead_jr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 52,
Visits: 114
|
That's what I did, and that's about what I came up with, other than I can not compensate for an over bore if there is one, but with the information that I have I am fairly sure this is a 312.
|
|
|