Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 202,
Visits: 89.8K
|
Hi Walt, I haven’t seen a message come through. If you want to use my email, you can reach me at mike.emersonmpls@gmail.comMike
MplsMike '56 Parklane Minneapolis, MN
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 1,
Visits: 2
|
Email sent regarding the matching G heads. Walt
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 1.6K
|
I got it. They're domed pistons. I looked at your specs 3 times before it registered. I guess I better cancel my Jeopardy contestant reservation.
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 734,
Visits: 21.4K
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 1.6K
|
Someone must have recycled those "throw-away" motors, because, after 66 years, they are just now gradually being replaced by the new "throw-away" engine. Technically speaking, "motors" are powered by electricity.
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 15 hours ago
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 134.0K
|
Or, maybe the previous owner was numerically illiterate, and could only count using his fingers? ALSO (re: posts), maybe someone at FoMoCo could see into the future, where Y-blocks would be overhauled many times (unlike with GMs ‘throw-away’ SBC motor), and numerous clean-up head millings would eventually stack up & become an issue with gasket sealing?
6 VOLTS/POS. GRD. NW INDIANA
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Months Ago
Posts: 464,
Visits: 183.3K
|
"Dots look like cylinder numbers. I would have just written the number instead of all the dots. ------"
Maybe for religious reasons? Maybe the Reverend knows...LOL
"FREE SAMPLE"
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 8 Months Ago
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 238.8K
|
Daniel: Posting the heads became necessary when Stock Car racers like Smokey Unick, were milling them well beyond factory recommendations.. Apparently also because the realighned intake ports on the new "G" heads, resulted in less casting support, which led to problems when raced..
Paul
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 1.6K
|
I know .025 is the maximum recommended for non-posted heads, but .032 doesn't sound extreme. However, I don't think many of use have a 10.5 static compression ratio. Do you remember what your dynamic ratio was?
Thanks
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Month
Posts: 734,
Visits: 21.4K
|
It seems like I remember ~.032" or so to get them down to 69ccs after porting the combustion chambers. Joe-JDC
JDC
|