Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 238.8K
|
Phil: If your bird's engine is in really good condition, it may be more trouble than it's worth to change the cam & lifters.. (consenses is that using old lifters is risky) Also, are you sure that the new cam is actually a 1957 EDB code cam? Standard replacement Ford cams after that date are not that spec, they are C4TZ or CAB-X, a truck cam. (info from a John Mummert cam chart). The only grinder that I'm aware of currently, that has the 1957 profile is Oregon Cams in Wash. (near Oregon's border) Ph# 360-256-7985 or 1-800 539-9165 (ask for Ken) if you wanted to check..
Paul
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 179.6K
|
Florida Phil. GooD information from all. IF you are unclear as to what posted and un-post ECZ-G heads are, it has to do with when the heads were cast. Ford made a design change on the internal structure of the castings in April (?) of the '57 model year. Heads used in late '57 production year y-block Fords and Mercs and on '58 model year 312 Mercs should have posted heads. Ted has previously posted the information for telling posted and un-posted G heads apart, but I'm having trouble locating it in the Forum Archive today. Tim McMaster has the info on his web site using pictures from Ted. Click the link below to view Tim's web site information on posted and un-posted heads http://yblockguy.com/techtips/postedheads.htmlHope this helps!
NoShortcuts a.k.a. Charlie Brown near Syracuse, New York
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 5 days ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 285.6K
|
I am very familiar with the weak transmission issue. Back in the day I used to buy 3 speeds from a junk yard for $20. We blew up dozens of them. Always got home some how. We always wanted a T85 but could afford it. I'm not racing these days, just driving to car shows.

|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 4 Months Ago
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 137.2K
|
I ran a simiar 292 in my '58 Ford Custom back in the early '60's. It was a very strong runner for what it was. The weak link as I see it is the transmission. Take it easy and you will be fine. A hard first to second shift will take out second and the cluster gear. My fix was an all syncro 3 speed out of a '63 and up Galaxie. Prety much bullet proof and you can use the stock shifter with slight modification. Will also need the appropriate clutch disk
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 12 days ago
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 190.5K
|
Well, those are good questions. It's unlikely your 292 is still the stock bore after all these years, but not impossible. So, you've got the actual swept area, the cc's of the heads, and the volume of the gaskets. Could also be the block's been decked. The 57 heads might also have been surfaced, IIRC, the pad on the end is 1.00" on a stock head. If my memory is failing (I know it's failing) someone will correct me. The long and short is until you take things apart and dig out the micrometers you're not going to know.
Those heads will work on that block, and probably be an improvement in terms of air flow. You're going to need to look at the intake and exhaust to see that increase however. The intake's pretty straight forward, but I think the 'bird exhaust manifold is different on the drivers side. The flat top 57 versions aren't cheap for the bird. The right side could be the same on the 57 motor, I don't know.
The cam is another item item, and plays into the effective compression ratio as opposed to static. I wouldn't attempt to change the lifters in the car, and wouldn't ever try to run used lifters on a new cam. Pulling the engine isn't that hard if you decide to do a cam change.
I had a kind of tired 292 in my bird, and bolted a supercharger on it anyway. Worked out ok till I built a new motor. So sometimes it's easier to just do it, and see how it works out, like Charlie said.
miker 55 bird, 32 cabrio F code Kent, WA Tucson, AZ
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 285.6K
|
Thanks for the great head chart. The heads off my 1957 272 have the casting numbers ECZ-G cast into them. From your chart I see they are the same as the 312 heads. If I bolt them onto my stock 1955 292, will I have 8.5 compression ratio? Should I mill the heads to raise the CR? If I do will I need to mill the intake? I won't know what the engine in my TBird actually is until I take it apart. It looks original, but it's too clean to be untouched after all these years.

|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 12 days ago
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 190.5K
|
I'd check the casting numbers first, as you never know what's original and what's changed. Start with the heads, and watch the cc of the chambers. http://www.ford-y-block.com/cylinderheadchart.htmI've done a 1 wire conversions on my 55, and I found the voltage at the battery was 1.5 volts below the voltage at the charging terminal. I don't do anything but 3 wire now, problem solved. A 3 3/8" tach with the bezel removed and the outer lip of the case ground off will fit in the 55 bezel. At least a SW did in my 55. It'll probably be more than 5000 rpm, depends on what you can find.
miker 55 bird, 32 cabrio F code Kent, WA Tucson, AZ
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 285.6K
|
I have removed a lot of engines, but never from an early TBird. I have a cherry picker and a lift. I was hoping not to have to do that. The transmission (OD) looks a little tight and I didn't want a big struggle. I have a feeling I'm going to pull the engine anyway. Getting to those goofy YBlock lifters without turning the engine over is a problem. Thanks for the info.

|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 346,
Visits: 12.2K
|
I replaced them in a 55 Bird years ago but wouldn't recommend it. I have pulled the engine leaving the transmission in place as well as the hood and radiator, using a cherry picker on the side. Makes changing everything a whole lot easier.
Vic Correnti
|