Profile Picture

First round of testing of the new aluminum heads is now complete.

Posted By Ted 15 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!

First round of testing of the new aluminum heads is now complete.

Author
Message
John Mummert
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 912, Visits: 7.4K
Although I've never tested a 3-2 set up we have found some definite trends with Y-Block engines. We found that with 9.5:1 compression and a streetable cam a Y-Block with ported factory heads could make 1.07-1.10 ft. lbs per cubic inch. This covered a number of builds from 314 cu in to 337 cu in and 224 @ .050" cams up to 240 @ .050" cams. Intakes ranged from modified 1957 ECZ-B intakes to Blue Thunder to Edelbrock 257 2-4 intake. The 314 made 1.13 ft lbs per cu in but had 10.0:1 CR.

Ted's stock head dyno mule comes in just a shade under that and experience indicates that ported heads will only add 10-15 ft lbs to that engine.

From the testing I have seen stock ECZ-G heads are limited to 285HP +-5. A good port job can take this up to 325-360 depending on cam, compression and displacement.

Porting Y-Block heads can make a substantial difference in HP but will have little effect on torque. All testing was done with either ECZ-G or -113 heads.

To make over 365hp with ported factory heads the testing I've done indicates that the CR must at least 10.5:1 and the cam needs to approach 250 degrees @ .050". Displacement will need to be 330+ cu in.

http://ford-y-block.com 

20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/2c0ef4dd-5dd8-408e-ba0d-74f6.jpg


Ted
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Co-Administrator

Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 205.0K
Pete's Panel (6/3/2010)
Hi Ted, do you think the performance of the Cain manifold will improve with the alloy heads???
Pete.  I doubt that I’d see any improvement in the numbers originally posted by the Cain manifold if used on the aluminum heads.  Torque band was flat and low on the ported heads that the Cain manifold was tried on and that was simply due to the runnerless design of the manifold.  But I do have plans to run that manifold again in the future on another set of ported iron heads while experimenting with some plenum dividers and different carb spacers.  All this is being done just to see if the manifold can even come close to matching the performance of some other intakes I have here.  Any information learned from this can go into the development of a true single plane intake for the Y.

Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)


randyh
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)Supercharged (260 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Years Ago
Posts: 112, Visits: 42.1K
John, The combustion chamber is small compared to the supercharger heads, what changes to head or pistons would be required to use these with a VR57 blower and what do you think performance would be?
John Mummert
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)Supercharged (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 912, Visits: 7.4K
A lot depends on the size of the engine. A .060" over 292 will have 9.75:1 compression if zero decked. If a lower CR is desired a dished piston will easily lower compression. The VS57 doesn't work that well with very low compression so best to keep it in the 9.25-9.75 range.

http://ford-y-block.com 

20 miles east of San Diego, 20 miles north of Mexico

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/2c0ef4dd-5dd8-408e-ba0d-74f6.jpg


PF Arcand
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
John: Possibly this has been covered before but I've not seen it. If your new heads are installed on a 292 or 312 with stock pistons (lets assume the block is not over bored more than 0.020 thousands) in a non decked block, what will the approximate compression ratios be? Thanks.

Paul


Reading This Topic


Site Meter