Profile Picture

3X2 Intake Manifold Testing - Results.

Posted By Ted 15 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
Ted
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Co-Administrator

Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 205.0K

Dyno testing is now complete on the 3X2 intake manifolds.  The Edelbrock 573 was at the top of the heap with the Offenhauser being at the bottom.  There was a 29HP difference between the best and the worst which is a bunch.  The dyno test range for each test was 2500-5500 rpms.  Besides looking at both the peak and average horspower and torque values, the engine performance with each intake was also ‘scored’ to get a better feel for overall performance using a single value.  The score is calculated by adding both the average HP and torque together and dividing that into the cubic inch of the engine and then multiplying that value by 1000.  Testing concluded with the first intake being rerun at the tail end as a validation that the engine was holding steady and because there was still some time left at the end of the day, the new Mummert intake was installed with a 600+ vacuum secondary Holley on top of a 2” four hole spacer and also ran.

 

Here’s how the various 3X2 manifolds ranked in overall performance from the top to the bottom.

1. 1703.7 pts - Edelbrock ‘573’

2. 1674.7 pts - Edmunds ‘DM-425’ large port

3. 1672.4 pts - Edelbrock ‘553’

4. 1667.7 pts - Edmunds ‘DM-424D’ small port

5. 1661.2 pts - Weiand ‘FM436’ large port

6. 1646.9 pts - Edmunds ‘FORD 424’ small port

7. 1561.2 pts - Offenhauser w/no identifying numbers

 

The test engine is a +060 over 312 with 9.2:1cr, dead stock ‘G’ heads, and Harland Sharp 1.6:1 rockers.  The same Stromberg carbs were used on all the manifolds without any jetting changes once manifold testing commenced.  The camshaft is a Crower Monarch with 238° @ 0.050”, ground on 110° lobe centers, installed 2° advanced, and 0.434” lift at the valve after valve lash.  All testing was performed with four tube headers running through Magnaflow mufflers.  This series of 3X2 intake manifold testing is also part of the durability testing being performed on the prototype Harland Sharp rockers which so far appears to be holding up fine.

 

For those of you that live and breathe horsepower and torque numbers, here are the peak values for the 3X2 intake manifolds but are still being listed in their order of scoring.

1. 336.0 Tq / 279.3 HP - Edelbrock ‘573’

2. 336.1 Tq / 266.5 HP - Edmunds ‘DM-425’ large port

3. 334.1 Tq / 270.1 HP - Edelbrock ‘553’

4. 338.6 Tq / 260.1 HP - Edmunds ‘DM-424D’ small port

5. 332.1 Tq / 266.2 HP - Weiand ‘FM436’ large port

6. 330.4 Tq / 261.9 HP - Edmunds ‘FORD 424’ small port

7. 311.5 Tq / 250.8 HP - Offenhauser w/no identifying numbers

 

And here’s the order in which the intakes were run on the engine.

1. Edelbrock ‘573’

2. Offenhauser w/no identifying numbers

3. Edelbrock ‘553’

4. Weiand ‘FM436’ large port

5. Edmunds ‘FORD 424’ small port

6. Edmunds ‘DM-424D’ small port

7. Edmunds ‘DM-425’ large port

8. Edelbrock ‘573’ (reinstalled to validate earlier run)

9. Mummert single four intake with 600 Holley (291.9HP / 346.0Tq)

 

Intake manifold changes were down to 35 minutes each at the end.

Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)


Ted
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Co-Administrator

Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)Co-Administrator (13.0K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 205.0K
And here’s a shot of all seven 3X2 intakes that were tested.

Top Row (left to right)

Edelbrock ‘553’, Edmund ‘DM-425’, Edmund ‘DM-424D’, Edelbrock ‘573’

 

Bottom Row (left to right)

Weiand ‘FM436’, Edmund ‘FORD 424’, Offenhauser

Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)


YellowWing
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)Supercharged (296 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 12 Years Ago
Posts: 296, Visits: 1.8K
Ted, Thanks for doing this! Very interesting the difference in HP figures for the different manifolds. Also interesting how easily the Mummert beat them all. Thanks again, Mike

1956 Fairlane Victoria (ORREO)

 

Overlooking Beautiful Rimrock AZ

MarkMontereyBay
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)Supercharged (980 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Years Ago
Posts: 733, Visits: 3.8K
Ted,



Wow....that is an impressive test. Thanks very much for all the work and clearly posted data. I was hoping the 573 would place a little better against Mummert's but reality wins out. For those of us still addicted to the 3x2 configuration, I wonder if some modifications are possible for the 573 to improve it. I may just keep the Mummert manifold on the shelf with an extra set of gaskets for easy swapping.



Thanks again.



Mark Hebard

57 Black Tbird 312/auto



charliemccraney
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)Supercharged (9.8K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Last Active: 25 minutes ago
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 441.6K
I'm surprised to see how close the Edelbrocks are to one another. It looks like the first six will work nicely on a driver. And the Offenhauser is not really as bad as it's made out to be. In most cases, each manifold will support higher than stock performance. In my mind, that means they work as advertised.


Lawrenceville, GA
lowrider
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)Supercharged (620 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 479, Visits: 10.9K
Thanks Ted. Although I'm running the 553 it sure outdid the Offy I had on it.

Dan      Kingman Az.      86409
BIGREDTODD
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)Supercharged (349 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 10 Years Ago
Posts: 324, Visits: 2.4K
Excellent information Ted!

Thanks for all the work and the clear presentation of the numbers...

Todd in Central California...about half way between Fresno and Sacramento

1956 Thunderbird - 1960 F-100 - 1961 Starliner - 1961 Imperial

mctim64
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)Supercharged (2.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Years Ago
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 5.0K
This is a good reason to be here, among many others, you just don't find information like this anywhere else.  Wink  Thanks Ted for all your work, it's a great help to all of us. Smile

http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/b1f2e0d6-2566-46b3-b81d-3ff3.jpg   God Bless. Smile  Tim                           http://yblockguy.com/

350ci Y-Block FED "Elwood", 301ci Y-Block Unibody LSR "Jake", 312ci Y-Block '58 F-100, 338ci Y-Block powered Model A Tudor

tim@yblockguy.com  Visalia, California    Just west of the Sequoias


joey
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)Supercharged (255 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 204, Visits: 5.3K
Awesome research work Ted!
bird55
Posted 15 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)Supercharged (1.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 1.1K, Visits: 58.8K
Fine work, Ted!

Thanks again for all the hard work you do for the y-blockers.

What a great benefit it is to be here.









http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/uploads/images/d8028aa4-f8f9-4981-9e51-4428.jpg
       A  L  A  N   F  R  A  K  E  S   ~  Tulsa, OK    




Reading This Topic


Site Meter