The only brake squeal I experience with ceramic pads is while backing up my driveway in my wife's Rav4. Squeal isn't a problem going down the road. 

switching from a standard brake pad you get more performance, and no brake dust. they have a tendency to be noisy thought, can mitigate by founding edges, cleaning, and applying some of the topical treatments to face or more effectively back of the pad. if they're factory replacement ceramic then cold performance isn't far off oe, and they warm up quickly. Depending what's important to you is your decision, if you want clean rims, or more performance they're a good option. if you hate brake noises then i wouldn't recommend. 
SEth

The pads that came with my Wilwood Dynalite brake kit for my 55 Tbird are semi-metallic. For my daily drivers, I always use ceramic pads. 

Less dust on rims, no rust color.
Take slightly longer to grab but get almost as good braking as metal pads.
Better braking than Organic,
Less chance of noisy brakes compared to metal or semi-metallic.


1936 Ford 3W Coupe : 56 T-Bird 312, 47 Packard 3 speed, 40 juice brakes.
1968 Merc Cyclone FB GT 390, Getting a better front clip!
1977 Ford F-250 Supercab RWD Explorer Long box.
1976 Chev Camaro RS LT
Future rebuild : 1949 Ford F-1

What are the pros and cons of ceramic brake pads.  Better braking ? increased rotor wear?
Got Granada discs on my 54, breaking is ok but thinking to go with ceramic pads if better.

54 Victoria 312;  48 Ford Conv 302, 56 Bird 312
Forever Ford
Midland Park, NJ