Author
|
Message
|
Deyomatic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 266,
Visits: 1.7K
|
Ted- thanks for that info. It SEEMS like you'd want to use the clutch for the reason you said- ease the load onto the system- but he's said a couple of times not to use the clutch....maybe what he meant was that you don't need to push the clutch in, and I just heard what I thought I heard.
Jim- The bolts holes from side to side are 8.5" on center. The ones in the car are narrower, and I poked a nail into the hole in the current trans to see if there was a threaded hole in the bellhousing and there is not. I'm guessing it's nothing that a drill and tap can't fix. Does that give a clue as to what size the bearing retainer hole in my bellhousing may be?
|
|
|
57RancheroJim
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 729,
Visits: 112.0K
|
If nobody chimes in with the bell housing hole measurement I can get it later this morning for you, it's still dark here..
|
|
|
Deyomatic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 266,
Visits: 1.7K
|
I'm not worried about it...this swap won't be happening while it's still cruising season up here.
I re-read what I said before and even I had a tough time understanding it! My current 3.03 is drilled for both bolt patterns, and it is using the narrow holes to mount to my bellhousing. I used the nail to poke into one of the wider holes to see if it went through, indicating a mounting hole, and it did not. This current 3.03 being drilled that way should make it easier to drill and tap for the wider holes...assuming the wide pattern matches.
Does the front bearing retainer support the trans weight, or do the bolts do that? Starting to stress out about that potentially not lining up.
|
|
|
paul2748
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 497.5K
|
Can you drill the narrow holes in the case? I was told (no experience) that you could drill the narrow holes in the case for a 4 speed toploader, I don't know if it applies to the 303 trans. Deyomatic (10/23/2023)
I'm not worried about it...this swap won't be happening while it's still cruising season up here. I re-read what I said before and even I had a tough time understanding it! My current 3.03 is drilled for both bolt patterns, and it is using the narrow holes to mount to my bellhousing. I used the nail to poke into one of the wider holes to see if it went through, indicating a mounting hole, and it did not. This current 3.03 being drilled that way should make it easier to drill and tap for the wider holes...assuming the wide pattern matches. Does the front bearing retainer support the trans weight, or do the bolts do that? Starting to stress out about that potentially not lining up.
54 Victoria 312; 48 Ford Conv 302, 56 Bird 312 Forever Ford Midland Park, NJ
|
|
|
57RancheroJim
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 729,
Visits: 112.0K
|
The bearing retainer to bell housing hole keeps everything in alignment, the bolts hold the weight.
|
|
|
Deyomatic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 266,
Visits: 1.7K
|
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
|
|
|
Deyomatic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 266,
Visits: 1.7K
|
Thanks Ted...That's great info. I'll keep this in mind whenever I dig into this little project. Probably be a few months.
|
|
|
BamaBob
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 153,
Visits: 11.2K
|
Ted, what was the original intended purpose of the crankshaft dots? Were they always there for identification purposes, or, did they serve an alignment or some other purpose needed at the time of their manufacture? I'm just curious about this since my 312 has the aspirin sized dot, but the main crank bearing caps have to be looked at to definitely determine the C.I. of the engine. Thanks for any info!
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
BamaBob (11/1/2023) Ted, what was the original intended purpose of the crankshaft dots? Were they always there for identification purposes, or, did they serve an alignment or some other purpose needed at the time of their manufacture? I'm just curious about this since my 312 has the aspirin sized dot, but the main crank bearing caps have to be looked at to definitely determine the C.I. of the engine. Thanks for any info!My thoughts point to being just for identification purposes. Likely helped when raw castings were being passed around during the machining process. While I can spot a 312 crankshaft versus a 292 crankshaft across the room, it may not have been that simple in the machining department or the engine assembly area. For what it's worth, the dot on the 312 crankshaft and the blank recess found on some of the 292 crankshafts has that dot or recess aligned with the #1 rod journal which could have been an assembly aid.
 Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|