Author
|
Message
|
bergmanj
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 257,
Visits: 3.9K
|
Folks, I'm "into" my Crown y-block due to several issues: it's a "morphidite" put together previously by someone unknown to me before I got the car.
When originally trying to deal with a Ford "94" 2-bbl carb issue vs a '57 distributor [incompatible vacuum advance] I removed the intake manifold to re-paint and block-off the crossover exhaust. In doing that I found dry & rusty intake bolt threads on the left (drivers) side which made me really suspicious of lack of top-end oiling to that side [passenger (right) side intake manifold bolts were in the usual "oily" condition, which I considered "good". That led me to removing the left head to check for oil-path blockage (oil was O. K.), which led me to removal of a lot of really "wet" carbon build-up in the combustion chambers and on the piston tops (the carb was obviously running really rich).
And that led me to removing the right-side head also: So, now I need to replace heads, etc.
I have an old set of the original-style steel head gaskets (Victor 1176BS) and may want to use them with permatex aviation gasket cement in order to retain the proper quench as the pistons are all "in" by approx. 0.020" recess (originally, Ford had those thin steel gaskets sprayed with one coat of fresh aluminum paint both sides, let dry, and re-coat with "dry-to-tacky" then immediately install and torque heads while still "tacky"). I'm really hesitant to use the newer composite gaskets due to this issue; and I'm not in a position to zero-deck the block or replace rods, etc., to bring pistons up. Suggestions please.
In '57, Ford eliminated the oil trays under the rocker arm assembly "due to a technical change" according to a TSB (I don't know what that "change" was). My rockers are a "57 (or later) variety with 1.54 rockers and self-locking adjusters: when I first looked at them, the adjusters were extended quite a lot for proper valve lash; I'm thinking that the trays ought to be left-out when I re-assemble to bring the rocker geometry to a better place. Suggestions, comments???
Finally, I'm looking for a good cooling system cleaner for use after I get it running again; I used to use "du Pont #7 Heavy Duty Engine Cleaner" [with Oxalic acid],,but, can't find it anymore. Suggestions??
Thanks, JLB
55 Ford Crown Victoria Steel Top
|
|
|
Cliff
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Months Ago
Posts: 863,
Visits: 13.3K
|
Hi, I agree with the steel head gaskets however would use copper coat spray, yes I would remove the oil trays, for engine cooling system I use oxalic acid and water, drain the system flush with water, I use 1/2 cup of the acid the rest water, always add acid to water never water to acid, I dilute it in a bucket first then pour it in and run it about 3 hours drain and flush with water and baking soda, flush again.
|
|
|
DryLakesRacer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 340.0K
|
Bergman …Since your heads are off I followed the Charles Morris book and using rotary burr remove a the rough casting you can see on the bottom of the head oil path and also rounded the corners. I also talked to Ted and bought the .530 oil seal tool and seals from Amazon and installed viton positive seals and removed the umbrellas that Ford used. The stock cam and 1.54 rocker needs at least .460” above the seal and after cutting them I measured each one. Took less than 2 hours to do that part. I also cleaned all the valves on a bench wire wheel and lapped them. All were good after 10k miles, I wasn’t looking for absolute perfection and they were really nice and the right width touch the seats. . Before I removed the valves I wire brushed the chambers so I would hurt the seats. I carefully did a little blending since the shop that did the rebuilding replaced all the seats before I bought the car. I also cleaned the carbon off every piston top by bringing to the top with cardboard circles in the adjacent cylinders and a vacuum cleaner running all the time. The top carbon ledge on the wall was removed with a razor blade. I covered all the holes to the valley too. After I re-installed the heads with no push rods, spark plugs, or the rocker arm assemblies on I cranked the engine on the starter until oil came up thru the feed hole on each side. I did squirt some in first and the oil started going down into the engine but as it spun and it’s pretty fast with no load, oil was coming out both sides. That was my check. When complete and running I took off the rocker covers off, ran the engine at idle, and made sure oil came out the 2 over flows. Yours may need the rocker arm shafts cleaned out. This took me 3 weeks working 2-3 hours a day. I also had the pan off.(another story) The engine has never run this good or quiet since I’ve own it.
56 Vic, B'Ville 200 MPH Club Member, So Cal.
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
bergmanj (4/6/2022) I have an old set of the original-style steel head gaskets (Victor 1176BS) and may want to use them with permatex aviation gasket cement in order to retain the proper quench as the pistons are all "in" by approx. 0.020" recess (originally, Ford had those thin steel gaskets sprayed with one coat of fresh aluminum paint both sides, let dry, and re-coat with "dry-to-tacky" then immediately install and torque heads while still "tacky"). I'm really hesitant to use the newer composite gaskets due to this issue; and I'm not in a position to zero-deck the block or replace rods, etc., to bring pistons up. Suggestions please.My two cents worth on the subject. The steel shim gaskets are not recommended due to several different issues with them. - Top of the list is sealing against water leaks. While painting or coating those gaskets with sealer may help, there’s no guarantee that will prevent water seepage.
- Any warpage of the cylinder heads is exasperated with the use of the steel shim head gaskets as those gaskets do not conform as well to any deformities that may be residing in the cylinder heads.
- The original grade five and grade six head bolts are barely adequate for clamping purposes and as time goes on, they tend to become more elastic. When new, they do not provide the same clamping force as the grade eight head bolts and subsequently do not put an adequate clamping pressure on the steel shim head gaskets. Keep in mind that Ford went to a grade eight head bolt in 1963 for the Y after years of fighting problems with the lesser grade head bolts.
- The long-term wear factor of the steel shim head gaskets is shorter than the composition head gaskets. Those passages in the gaskets that are blocked by design will eventually rust out and promote an overheating scenario.
- And not to be forgotten is the retorqing of the head bolts after running an engine with steel shim head gaskets. That retorquing of the head bolts is not required with composition gaskets.
While it is desirable to keep the piston quench minimal, the advantages of using composition head gaskets over the steel shim head gaskets more than outweighs the disadvantages. On a stock 292 using ECZ-G heads, the difference in compression ratio between using the oem steel shim head gasket versus the BstGskt 572G head gasket is a half a point. With the lower quality of todays gasoline, that’s likely not in the wrong direction to be going with the compression ratio. With all that being said, I do prefer the Best Gasket head gaskets over some of the other brands that are out there. Best Gasket has continually improved the head gasket design for the Y and those gaskets seal from the git go without requiring a retorque of the cylinder heads after a period of running. The ‘blue’ Fel-Pro head gaskets are noted for coolant leakage at the lower edge of the cylinder heads. That’s a result of too much material in those gaskets around the pushrod holes which prevents an equal clamping force at the bottom of the cylinder heads. Fel-Pro has been talked to about this but they were not into retooling the head gasket dies to fix that particular problem. Feel free to post other views on this subject.
 Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|
FORD DEARBORN
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 751,
Visits: 113.4K
|
Exactly what happened with the blue Fel-Pro gaskets on my engine. There's evidence of coolant weeping at the lower edge on the cylinder heads. I've never been able to sneak up and catch it leaking, though. It leaves a couple frosty white streaks running down the block but haven't noticed any additional streaking lately. Wish I had known of the Best gasket before I assembled the engine. Live and learn..............
64F100 57FAIRLANE500
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
bergmanj (4/6/2022) In '57, Ford eliminated the oil trays under the rocker arm assembly "due to a technical change" according to a TSB (I don't know what that "change" was). My rockers are a "57 (or later) variety with 1.54 rockers and self-locking adjusters: when I first looked at them, the adjusters were extended quite a lot for proper valve lash; I'm thinking that the trays ought to be left-out when I re-assemble to bring the rocker geometry to a better place. Suggestions, comments???That ‘technical change’ was likely related to the increased lobe lift for the 1957 camshafts. To achieve more lift, the base circle of the camshaft was reduced. This dropped the lifter lower into the lifter hole when at rest which then required a change to the valve train to correct or optimize the rocker arm geometry. Rather than alter the machined height of the pads cast into the heads that the rocker stands sit upon, change the valve stem lengths, or shorten the heights of the rocker support stands themselves, the easy fix for correcting the geometry was to simply remove the ‘valve spring oil baffles’. That was a simple fix where the cylinder heads and rocker assemblies for all years would still interchange.
 Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|
DryLakesRacer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 340.0K
|
Ted. and others . . . . . Do you like the baffles as good for the engine/cylinder head or oiling in general? Was Ford correct in using them and did they perform correctly as designed?
56 Vic, B'Ville 200 MPH Club Member, So Cal.
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
DryLakesRacer (4/8/2022) Ted. and others . . . . . Do you like the baffles as good for the engine/cylinder head or oiling in general? Was Ford correct in using them and did they perform correctly as designed?The oil baffles under the rocker stands are a plus when they can be used. As previously mentioned, FoMoCo discontinued using them on the ’57 and newer model Y-Blocks. Although the valve lifts on the ’58 and newer Y engines went back to the ’56 and earlier cam specs, the oil baffles did not make their way back onto those later model engines. This could very well have been an item that was eliminated simply due to the costs outweighing the perceived benefits. In ’56, the oil trough for the timing chain and the fuel pump eccentric counterweight were phased out. The oil baffles were just another piece of extra engineering that was ultimately eliminated on the Ford Y engines. Those particular baffles would appear to be more beneficial when using umbrella seals on the guides. The use of positive valve seals does tend to eliminate the need for the oil baffles all together but retaining the original valve train geometry does require the baffles to be in place if using the original stock small lift camshafts. I’ll add that when going with the aluminum heads and/or roller rocker arm assemblies, the baffles must be eliminated regardless of the type of valve seal being used. If it’s any consolation, the Ford FE engines used some form of valve train oil baffle for all years of production (1958-1976).
 Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|
panel driver
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 117,
Visits: 5.7K
|
Ted, would you mind posting a picture of these baffles. I don't think I ever seen them. Thanks Joe
Located in Harford County Maryland
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: 2 days ago
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 205.0K
|
|
|
|