Profile Picture

Which camshaft should i choose for a stock 312

Posted By Mats Paulsson 4 Years Ago
You don't have permission to rate!
Author
Message
312YBlock
Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)Supercharged (591 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 217, Visits: 57.3K
For whatever it’s worth I have an Isky E4 in my 312 and am very happy with the low to midrange performance. I have a 55 T-Bird w/T-86 3 speed OD and non OD 3.78 rear. It wakes up around 1,000 rpm.

1955 312 T-Bird Warwick, NY
Mats Paulsson
Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Normally aspirated

Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 11, Visits: 385
Ok, tanks for info. do you think it is special valve springs for a -57 stock camshaft?
PF Arcand
Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)Supercharged (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 3.3K, Visits: 238.8K
Oregon Cams, out of Vancouver Wash, can make a copy the 1957 Cam, which is a step up from your 1956 Cam, assuming that your engine wasn't overhauled at some point previously?. I mention that because Ford's factory replacements after '57 were actually '55 cams or according to Mummert, close to truck spec's.. A  '57 cam has more lift & duration than the earlier Cams, but not enough to cause issues with the auto trans.. .


Paul
slumlord444
Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)Supercharged (2.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Months Ago
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 137.8K
I ran a regrind of the 57 Blower cam for some time. Still have the engine stashed away. A bit more radical than the stock 57 cam but a good mild street cam. Not sure exactly how this compares to the Isky E4.
55blacktie
Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)Supercharged (3.0K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 1.8K
Take a look at Mummert's 57+ cam. It has more lift (Ted says Y-blocks like lift) than the E4 and a wider lobe separation angle (111). Ted has recommended an E4 ground with 112 LSA vs. 108 for off-the-shelf E4. 
Cliff
Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Supercharged

Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)Supercharged (2.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 879, Visits: 13.5K
E4 is good, watch the deck height and thickness of the head gasket (important) Isky or Johnson lifters are good.
Mats Paulsson
Question Posted 4 Years Ago
View Quick Profile
Normally aspirated

Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)Normally aspirated (46 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Years Ago
Posts: 11, Visits: 385
Hi.
I have a Mercury Montclair from 1956 with a 312. The engine is out from the car for renovation of the heads and general overhaul of the engine.
I will keep it stock, but perhaps upgrade the camshaft one step from stock if possible. 
What i have is:
Stock 312 from 1956  225HP
Engineblock: Stock ECZ 6015C
Heads:Stock ECZ- C comp.9,0 :1
Intake manifold : ECZ 9425-B singel 4 barrel.
Exhaust manifold: Stock
Carburattor  : Edelbrock 1404 cfm 500
Rockerarms : ECG 6564  ratio 1.54:1
Distributor : from  y-block 1961 with Ignitor
Transmission : Merc-O-Matic 3-speed
Rear axle: stock with gear ratio 3:15

If i choose a new camshaft with stock spec. which brand has best quality (US made) and type of ? same for the lifters.
If i want little more out of the engine can i go for Isky 3000444 (E4 ) with the spec. above? or is there any camshaft in between stock camshaft and E4 with good quality?
I prefer a low and mid range camshaft , i only use the car for street and crusing, and it is importante with good idle.





Reading This Topic


Site Meter