Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 183.3K
|
IIRC, the 57 has the rather flat top, the 55-56 much more round. It flows better than the early manifolds, I don’t know if Ted’s exhaust test did both.
miker 55 bird, 32 cabrio F code Kent, WA Tucson, AZ
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 179.6K
|
Phil and Gary. I checked with a friend who has been into 'Birds forever. In checking his parts, he has an ECJ 9431-C exhaust manifold tagged as being off a '57 Bird driver's side. He also has an ECJ 9431-A exhaust manifold tagged as being off a '56 Bird driver's side. Other than the casting number, I don't know the difference in the two castings. IF anyone can reference Gil Baumgartner's authored Classic Thunderbird Club International Thunderbird Restoration Manual, you will likely be able to obtain more info. I don't have access to the book at this writing. Hope this helps.
NoShortcuts a.k.a. Charlie Brown near Syracuse, New York
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Years Ago
Posts: 80,
Visits: 47.9K
|
I have a couple nice ECJ 9431-A but no -C Gary
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: Last Year
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 285.6K
|
Casting number ECJ 9431 C Email me at phil@lakefrontflorida.com or call 352 223-4483 and ask for Phil
|