| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 2 Years Ago
 Posts: 1.2K, 
                Visits: 285.6K
 
 | 
                I have used Red's Y Block Headers in the past in a 1957 Ford Passenger car.  They're not fancy, but they work.  Anyone tried them in a 1955 Thunderbird with a manual transmission?    What are other alternatives to stock exhaust manifolds.  
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 7 hours ago
 Posts: 772, 
                Visits: 22.4K
 
 | 
                FPA.   Best header for torque and horsepower out there short of custom.  Ceramic coated and fit snug to engine.  I recently tried to get a set of headers made for my '55 Thunderbird, and the so called "header guru" quoted me a price of $3500.00 and I would have to take the car to Charlotte for the fitting.  My FPAs made the best score on a dyno test recently among five different brands.   Joe-JDC.            
			    
 JDC
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: ModeratorsLast Active: 11 hours ago
 Posts: 6.1K, 
                Visits: 442.8K
 
 | 
                In Ted's testing, the FPA headers were right at the top and are the best headers you can buy off-the-shelf for a Y, period.  Too bad they only fit T-Birds.http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/FindPost99070.aspx Lawrenceville, GA
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 2 Weeks Ago
 Posts: 1.9K, 
                Visits: 194.9K
 
 | 
                I’ve run both sets on my 55 bird, manual trans.  The Red’s aren’t a true “Tri-Y”, as the primary tubes aren’t paired to the firing order.  There’s a pipe available that goes from the exit and snakes down the the original exhaust system.  Kind of an S bend.  It’s 1 1/2” or so, and mates to the stock muffler.  They looked good, fit well, and held up fine.  But they don’t buy you a lot of power due to the size restriction.
 The FPA’s are just what Ted’s results showed. They also fit well, but they’ve got a bigger collector.  The ones on the car now have a 2 1/4” exhaust, exiting behind the rear wheel.  My car has a tri-4 bar with coil overs in back, otherwise I would have gone 2 1/2”.
 
 Based only on the seat of my pants, I’d say there’s not much difference with a stock motor and full exhaust system.  You start adding ported head, more cam, at one point I ran an SN series supercharger, the FPA’s start to post the gains.  Currently, the car runs a 10.5 to 1 compression and aluminum heads.  No doubt in my mind the FPA’s are needed with those mods.
 
 miker
 55 bird, 32 cabrio F code
 Kent, WA
 Tucson, AZ
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 2 Years Ago
 Posts: 1.2K, 
                Visits: 285.6K
 
 | 
                Thanks for the replies.  When I pulled the motor out of my 55 TBird, I found two different types of exhaust manifolds.  One side was the original 55 and the other was from an early sixties Y block of some kind.  I would like to find two 1957 TBird exhaust manifolds which I assume are rare and pricey.  I ran a set of FPA headers in a 1957 Ford a few years back and I liked the quality.  I am not a serious racer.  My car has 57 heads, intake and valve train.  I am building a new motor with an Isky E4 cam.   I am looking for options.  
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 4 hours ago
 Posts: 560, 
                Visits: 8.3K
 
 | 
                Right side exhaust manifold is same as passenger car, left side is T-Bird only
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 3 Years Ago
 Posts: 120, 
                Visits: 33.3K
 
 | 
                Sanderson also makes a set of headers for the T-Bird (FTB1:$575.00 coated) although not as good as the FPA's.          
			    				
			    
             | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 3 hours ago
 Posts: 3.6K, 
                Visits: 497.7K
 
 | 
                This guy may have a set of 57 manifolds for a Tbird   Adrian, lilbirds567@wmconnect.com .  No idea what he would want for them  Florida_Phil (7/8/2018)54 Victoria 312;  48 Ford Conv 302, 56 Bird 312
 Thanks for the replies.  When I pulled the motor out of my 55 TBird, I found two different types of exhaust manifolds.  One side was the original 55 and the other was from an early sixties Y block of some kind.  I would like to find two 1957 TBird exhaust manifolds which I assume are rare and pricey.  I ran a set of FPA headers in a 1957 Ford a few years back and I liked the quality.  I am not a serious racer.  My car has 57 heads, intake and valve train.  I am building a new motor with an Isky E4 cam.   I am looking for options. Forever Ford
 Midland Park, NJ
 
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 2 Years Ago
 Posts: 1.2K, 
                Visits: 285.6K
 
 | 
                I emailed Adrian and he has a 1957 Thunderbird driver side exhaust manifold he will sell me for $175.  In the photo he sent me the middle casting number is "9429" and the bolts are broken off in the exhaust flange.   Isn't the right casting number for a 1957 Thunderbird Exhaust manifold ECJ-9431-C?   
 
 | 
				
		
					| 
	            Group: Forum MembersLast Active: 2 Years Ago
 Posts: 1.4K, 
                Visits: 179.6K
 
 | 
                Phil.  I checked with a friend who has been into 'Birds forever.  In checking his parts, he has an ECJ 9431-C exhaust manifold tagged as being off a '57 Bird driver's side.  He also has an ECJ 9431-A exhaust manifold tagged as being off a '56 Bird driver's side.   Other than the casting number, I don't know the difference in the castings. IF you can reference Gil Baumgartner's authored Classic Thunderbird Club International Thunderbird Restoration Manual, you will likely be able to obtain more info.  I don't have access to the book at this writing.     Hope this helps.          
			    				
			    NoShortcuts a.k.a. Charlie Brown
 near Syracuse, New York
 
 |