Author
|
Message
|
DryLakesRacer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 340.0K
|
Meteor, I have read much concerning proper cooling, not normally in stock cars. Most of my research is for over 13-1 compression and I do understand what you are saying concerning the research and engineering done when these were built. My father bought a new 1956 Ford Victoria when I was 12 and that car never had any cooling problem no matter what time of year and where we were and we went to the desert a lot. The gauge was always near center and never heated while idling or stuck in traffic. Engine/trans combo in this car is identical to moms. The engine has 4000 miles on it and is stock except for an over bore. It is in proper tune but if you let it idle, the temp continued to go up until it was ready to blow. With the cap off 200*+ with a thermometer not a heat gun came pretty quick. This is when I noticed there was very little if any movement of water. A rpm increase of 200-300 started a water movement and the temp would slowly come down. My wife would ask why did I need to put the car in neutral at a long signal and she started to watch the gauge too; driving for the most part was good but no way would I take on the a freeway and hope not to get stuck in traffic.
This is why I sped up the pump. Some here say it's bad and others say OK. Even on the hyway I drive at 65 or under which is under 2400 rpm. If I had an AOD, the smaller pulley would be perfect.
As for the reduced bypass. In my calculations even with the thermostat open by volume 10-20% is bypassing the radiator at all times if you measure the opening of the thermostat at full open. the 3/16" hole flows a small amount of water so the pump does not dead head even tho that really does not hurt a centifugal pump. GM's have been working like that for years The car heats up properly at least to me and can now sit and idle for 10-15 minutes or more right at 175-180 which is fine.
I do appreciate your concern and I did not want to alter the original performance of any stock part but in my case I saw no other choice with what I saw and what others wrote on other threads. I've been struggling with this for over 2 years. For now this is working, others said it helped them too....JD.
PS: Greenbirds...:<
56 Vic, B'Ville 200 MPH Club Member, So Cal.
|
|
|
slick56
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 3 Weeks Ago
Posts: 460,
Visits: 4.4K
|
Here is a fan shroud on fleabay that would not look out of place.I do not know if this is a copy of an original accessory?
South Australia
|
|
|
Ted
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Active: Yesterday
Posts: 7.3K,
Visits: 204.6K
|
In looking at the Ford parts catalog, there were six different water pump pulleys for the 1956 Fords with V8 engines. The diameters are as follows: 6.35” (extra cooling fan and 60 amp generator)
6.82” (A/C) 6.88” 6.94” (3 blade fan) 7.37” 7.44” (4 blade fan) Depending upon the gearing and accessories, FoMoCo deemed it necessary to vary the water pump speed for the various V8 applications.
Lorena, Texas (South of Waco)
|
|
|
DryLakesRacer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 340.0K
|
Thank you Ted..I'll bet the 6.35" would have also solved my problem...
Slick. That's the shroud I ordered. Like I said the fan needs to mount directly to the water pump to place the fan in the correct position in the shroud and if you have 3 pulleys on the crank the fan will hit it. If you have no P/S or the your P/S pump pulley is flat it will clear. By the pix on FleeBay you can see it's a little rough. The one I recieved was not that bad but I spent 3 hours sanding, filling and priming just the top half. It is ABS plastic and made by Southwest Thunderbirds in Texas. The owner said he had been making them for 19 years....Even if it fit my car I believe I would have still had the problem. JD
56 Vic, B'Ville 200 MPH Club Member, So Cal.
|
|
|
2721955meteor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Months Ago
Posts: 927,
Visits: 190.0K
|
drylake you apear to have a rare problem. re by pass i went threw severl different engin cos,gm 8cyl engines al had by pass at the therm,some wher built in,all fords,except flat heads,early flat heads never had therms,so a constant water flowwas in play.we all know flat heads had history of over heat.my 47 ford pickup had heat isues esp at idel. cured buy drilling the back of both heads and ran a line to drain in both water pumps. end of problem. every diesel cat ever built from 1950s to 2000 had bypass tubes. most truck instalations had a small tank in rad with a shunt line to water pump as cavitation hapened when therms opened as pump could not get enough water for short time while flow changed. In your case i still feal ther is some other isue. cavitation does not damage the water pump but with bubles in engine block and heads lead to hot spots and cracked heads or blown head gaskets,as well as in acurategauges Hope you get to the botem of your isue and will make interesting read
|
|
|
GREENBIRD56
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 102.7K
|
Re- engineering the 292/312 cooling system to function at hot idle, especially for an automatic in gear - is the main complaint I've seen on here over the years. Engines with the older spark advance systems were more prone to get "retarded" and heat-up - which just magnified the problem. Some vehicles got the problem solved with a fan change (especially those with the full sized radiator) - some got a bit better water flow with a more free flowing thermostat, and still better with the throttled bypass. Changing the pulley ratio jacks up both the fan speed (air flow) and the pump flow when the motor is sitting loaded against the converter at 550/600 rpm - and getting the job done with little evil. Mine is up about 20% - meaning that water and air flow potential at hot idle is now the equivalent of 670/730 rpm which does not approach "cavitation" - but does do a decent job of maintaining temperature equilibrium. I put a fan clutch on mine to slow down the fan at road speeds (per Hayden it slips 10% at full engagement).
So what RPM do most of our cruising outfits run at highway speed - steady state? My money says virtually none of them would reach a point anywhere near "cavitation" and then stay there.
Steve Metzger Tucson, Arizona
|
|
|
2721955meteor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Months Ago
Posts: 927,
Visits: 190.0K
|
just found a old book on all the facts re 1956 ford cars,page59 claimsall v8 engines in 56 came with fords new4 blade ,silent spin fan. it goes on to say6cyl and the engines in thunder birds.use the proven3 blade type.page 61 goes on to say the cooling systems are deesighned to run13psi. it goes on to say externa bypass(internal in i-6) permits continuous recirculation of coolant when stat closed. also claiming top tank in rad has a difusor to eliminate bubles.. another old book from larrys tbird ofers a 6 bladed fan( part #t8600b) to adress cooling isues with air cond.. ford book has form #7574.it apears 55 models had heat isues being adressed in 56?? Just more on the site to discuss.
|
|
|
DryLakesRacer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 Weeks Ago
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 340.0K
|
Whow..I never thought this would stir so much especially since this has been discussed about 2 years ago.. Greenbirds PM'd me over a year ago on the changing of the pulley to the 289/302/351 of just over 5", I was reluctant to do it and continually felt my 292 as built would at some point prove to me it could run at 175* in traffic/idle for what I would think was a normal amount of time. I'm not talking of going to Reno NV.for "Hot August Nights" and cruising for hours I just want to sit at a long signal and not have it heat up. As stated above it wasn't until I saw no movemet of water in the rad at idle especially in gear that I knew I had to do something. A Ford NOS temp sender at least made my gauge "tell the truth" when matched with a thermometer.
Ted's reply really helped. I did not know there were so many different diameters available but it does stand to reason a car with factory A/C in Texas or Arizona with an auto trans may need to pull more air and and flow more water than one in Minnesota with no A/C and a stick.
As a side note the car came with a 6 bade fan and a 4 would probably work fine and get me better fuel mileage. I have installed a 57-62 distributor with a carb proper vacuum (Carter WCFB small base). Like I've said this car performs perfect with the exception of idle over heat. I took it out this weekend and the temp performed perfect for me 165*-170* when driving city streets or freeway. I left it idling in front of my house when I got home for 15 minutes and it was 87* outside. Engine temp went to 180* and never went up any higher. Drove around the block and it came right down to 165*-70* and I was happy. All I'm saying is what worked just from making sure I put the temp sender correctly.............JD
56 Vic, B'Ville 200 MPH Club Member, So Cal.
|
|
|
2721955meteor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 6 Months Ago
Posts: 927,
Visits: 190.0K
|
I cant help but wonder if the fan speed is the critical isue at idel in gear,as you need air flow to exchange the heat fromwater to air.shrouds ar very critical as well as pans and belting wher air flowes around the radcore.we wher told in trade school that the hoter the water the better the heat exchang is but most important item is air flow threw the core.so the thery waswater flow threw was not as critical as air flow.So when the top tank aproches the same temp as the botem pushing more water threw the core will result in no change.once road speed comes into play more air flow the temp rise is controled.pump cavitation is likely as stat opens and closes as more waterchanges direction.the post on the experiment re the tbird seemed to confirm ther problem was solved re shroud and blocking lost air flow .It is getting hot hear i sure hope my ranchero does not heat up,as the crow hear is not verry tastey. cliff
|
|
|
carltonvickey
|
|
Hitting on all eight cylinders
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 5 Years Ago
Posts: 2,
Visits: 20
|
I have a 1956 ford heat gauge doesn't work, replaced sender, still does not work was going to trace wiring next. My wiring diagram shows on wire going from sender to gauge and one wire going to switch, my car has two wires going to gauge, what is the other wire for
|
|
|