I agree with Paul. If the bores in the 292 NEED to be overbored, there has got to be wear to the original pistons that moved in those bores.
Piston skirt wear has been mentioned, and can take the form of scuffing or scoring. Also, the diameter of the piston skirt may be reduced from normal wear. The piston skirts can be knurled with an X pattern (commonly called 'diamond' pattern) to expand them to compensate for skirt wear.
In a high mileage engine, the top ring groove often incurs significant wear as well. This is a because it is nearest to combustion chamber temperatures and pressure as well as all the airborne abrasives that may enter the engine.
Perfect Circle (for one) made a go no-go gauge for checking top and second ring groove wear. If the gauge went into the groove far enough to hit its 'shoulder', it indicated that the groove was oversize by .006 or more. If the top groove was oversize, the correction was to re-machine the top groove, add a top groove spacer to take up the material removed by the manual machining operation, and then re-ring. The Perfect Circle tool for re-machining the top grooves was called a Manulathe. The Manulathe used three locating pins that fit into the second groove to assure the top groove being re-machined in the same plane as the original groove.
IF there was a ridge at the top of the cylinder that had to be removed to take the pistons out, I'd bet the top ring groove needs resizing. Probably because of labor costs today, for passenger car applications, most worn pistons are replaced rather than re-machining top grooves or expanding piston skirts by knurling to adjust fit in the bore.
Much to evaluate in re-using 'pre-tested' (spelled USED) engine parts.
NoShortcuts
a.k.a. Charlie Brown
near Syracuse, New York