Comparison of Mummert Heads to Original Ford Castings


http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/Topic45010.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By Oldmics - 14 Years Ago
Gentlemen

Can this thread compare the engineering differences between Mummerts heads and an original stock set of non posted "G" heads.

I have gleamed some of the differences by reading the existing posts in all of the topics but thought a dedicated post for comparing might be helpfull for quick references.

Also any porting suggestions ? Isnt that terrible w00t

All that work and were just waiting to grind em up Hehe

Oldmics

By Rono - 14 Years Ago
Hi John;

I'm on the East coast now up in Maine. I could be wrong, but I don't think John's new aluminum heads have the bigger intake valves like the "G" heads.

Rono

By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
Rono (5/31/2010)
Hi John;

I'm on the East coast now up in Maine. I could be wrong, but I don't think John's new aluminum heads have the bigger intake valves like the "G" heads.

Rono

Here are specifications for the new head

SPECIFICATIONS

VALVE SIZES: 1.94" intake     1.54" exhaust   11/32" stem

VALVE MATERIAL: Stainless steel,

By Rono - 14 Years Ago
Thanks for correcting me Bill...

Rono.

By Oldmics - 14 Years Ago
So the valves are the same size on the "G" heads as Mummerts?

What is different about the new heads that makes them superior?

Oldmics

By Hoosier Hurricane - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics:

Intakes are the same, exhausts are .030 bigger than G heads.  What makes them superior?  John Mummert's expertise.

By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics,

I think you will find there has been port flow improvements & combustion chamber efficiency over the cast heads and for me, the dyno figures indicate somethings different.Tongue

By pegleg - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics (5/31/2010)
So the valves are the same size on the "G" heads as Mummerts?

What is different about the new heads that makes them superior?

Oldmics

       The ports are vastly superior as cast, and they get better with a grinder. If you know how. The combustion chamber design improves the valve shrouding issue, and requires CONSIDERABLY less timing. Means it works better. the heads are less than half the weight of the factory heads and the engine runs cooler, although the water temp will likely be higher!! work on that for a while! Ted picked up 50+ hp with a set.

By Oldmics - 14 Years Ago
Now thats the kind of information I"m looking for.

Is there a diagram of the original head ports and then an overlay of Johns improvements to the ports for comparison.

I"m curious what he did to the ports? Moved them in the new castings-changed the pattern?

Oldmics

By Ted - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics (5/31/2010)
....What is different about the new heads that makes them superior?

Oldmics

The intake valve has been moved closer to where the exhaust valve was or away from the edge of the cylinder wall.  To help this along, the exhaust valve was placed closer to its adjoining cylinder wall.  Both the intake and exhaust valves have also been relocated higher in the bore and closer to the intake manifold.  All this makes for better flow numbers before port improvements come into the picture.  The ports themselves have also been reconfigured internally which just adds to the improvement in flow seen from relocating the valves.

 

The oil drainage in the valve cover area has been greatly improved on the aluminum heads.  Oil drainage is no longer relying solely on the two oil drain holes at each end of the head as the new head design has oil drainage taking place at some of the pushrod holes.

 

Add to the list of improvements the use of 14mm sparkplugs and redesigned combustion chambers.  The 14mm spark plugs do sit more inboard than the 18mm plugs on the stock heads which at the bare minimum gives additional spark plug wire room around the headers.  The combustion chamber design likes less total timing which makes the combustion more efficient.  Brake specific fuel numbers are lower which points to better fuel economy if the driver can keep a light foot on the throttle.

 

 

 

By Oldmics - 14 Years Ago
Now please tell me about those roller rockers?

Ratios availiable and where to obtain them.

Oldmics

By marvh - 14 Years Ago
Ted:

I noticed on the top picture with the old style rockers with jamb nuts it has different stands than stock.



Does the new head require these different rocker stands?

Does the new heads require a special length of push rod or will one of the three lengths of '55 and later y-block push rods Ford used fit.

marv
By Grizzly - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics (5/31/2010)
Gentlemen

Can this thread compare the engineering differences between Mummerts heads and an original stock set of non posted "G" heads.

I have gleamed some of the differences by reading the existing posts in all of the topics but thought a dedicated post for comparing might be helpfull for quick references.

Also any porting suggestions ? Isnt that terrible w00t

All that work and were just waiting to grind em up Hehe

Oldmics

On the contrary removing the "as cast" finish is know to improve flow. A linished finish is desirable not smooth or polished finish. I'm interested where in the RPM range this linished finish will provide an increase. It could be that the next step could turn them into racing heads and better in the WOT, high RPM applications.

As these head are released I'm sure that there will be tuning tips and HP will increase accordingly. As people try different things in there own application. Porting is the obvious next step and of course there is different levels of porting. I think John has put more material in the port walls to accommodate racers and additional porting.

I'm guessing that when John Sits down and ports the heads for the racer trial the flow bench will reveal some secrets.  

  

    

By Ted - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics (6/1/2010)
Now please tell me about those roller rockers?

Ratios availiable and where to obtain them.

The pictured rockers are 1.6:1 ratio and available from Dove Manufacturing.  The Harland Sharp 1.6:1 rockers are similar except bronze bushed for the shafts and although the HS rockers have not been tested on the aluminum heads, they are expected to fit just like the Dove rockers as far as pushrod alignment goes.  For the aluminum heads, I’ve found that a different combination of left, right, and zero pushrod offset rockers are required versus the combination used on the iron heads.  I have a set of 1.6:1 Rocker Arm Specialist rockers here (on loan from Gary) and those look to be installable on the aluminum heads but some additional offset rockers will need to be ordered to make up a full pair of rocker arm assemblies for both heads.
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
marvh (6/1/2010)
Ted:
I noticed on the top picture with the old style rockers with jamb nuts it has different stands than stock.

Does the new head require these different rocker stands?
The pictured stands are supplied with the aluminum heads as the original stands will no longer bolt up.  The relocated valves necessitated new stands with a wider bolt spacing but these new stands still work with factory shafts and rockers.  The bolt sizes holding the pedestals to the heads have been increased from 5/16-18 to 3/8-16.

 

marvh (6/1/2010)
Does the new heads require a special length of push rod or will one of the three lengths of '55 and later y-block push rods Ford used fit.
Going from the iron to the aluminum heads and keeping the 1.54:1 rockers in place required a longer pushrod.  The iron headed engine had the 7.970” pushrods while 8.105” pushrods were used with the aluminum heads.  When switching to the 1.6:1 rockers on the aluminum heads, a set of 7.935” long pushrods were installed.
By PF Arcand - 14 Years Ago
I could be mistaken, but I believe there's a correction needed on the inquiry about original valve sizes. 1957 head intakes were 1.925" in Dia. not 1.94". Replacement Stainless valves are 1.94". Correct?
By Oldmics - 14 Years Ago
Can you tell us what venders are offering  the longer push rods to accomidate the al heads?

I assume (you know what happens when you assume Tongue) Mummert is selling the longer push rods?

Oldmics

By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics (6/2/2010)
Can you tell us what venders are offering  the longer push rods to accomidate the al heads?

I assume (you know what happens when you assume Tongue) Mummert is selling the longer push rods?

Oldmics

Why not keep things in perspective! just ask john, i think you will find that after developing these heads, he, john has the accompanying parts to make it all work!!:Wink

By John Mummert - 14 Years Ago
The correct length pushrod for the aluminum heads is the same as the 1954-55 and 60-64 Y-Blocks so they are readily available. I have 300 on the shelf just in case.

Valves were moved closer to the intake manifold. Rocker shafts also needed to be moved to retain the same distance from the valve stem to the rocker shaft so existing rockers could be used.

Intake valves were moved toward the exhaust valves. Exhaust valves were moved away from the intake valves. Current valve spacing is 1.815". This limits total valve diameter of intake and exhaust valve to 3.52".

Spark plug has been moved closer to the exhaust valve while Ford put the spark plug on the exact centerline of the cylinder. Spark plugs are now 14mm instead of 18mm.

As you might guess the ports are not as large as they could be. We needed to make a streetable head for engines as small as 298 cu in ( .030 over 292).

Intake valves are 1.94" as sold. We have already done some porting and testing with 1.98" intake for Ted's EMC engine. We have tested a lower intake port @ 274CFM and 255CFM with a ported intake installed. This pencils out to 500HP+

By PF Arcand - 14 Years Ago
I note that the new heads have virtually square exhaust ports at the exit. Ford ports had an angle in the inside corner at exit (just on the end ports if I recall without looking at a head) & I recall reading that this was because flow dropped there if the port was opened up there to much. Comments?
By Hoosier Hurricane - 14 Years Ago
Paul:

The angled portion of the exhaust ports (all 4 have them) is one place where you can hit water when porting.  The water jacket in that area is there because of the spark plug location.  Compare the plug locations of John's and Ford's heads.  John doesn't need that angled water jacket casting.  By the way, '54 heads had squared ports, they used 14mm plugs instead of 18mm.

By Oldmics - 14 Years Ago
Can we get the air flow numbers on Johns new heads and also an air flow number on a set of stock "G" heads for comparison purposes?

Oldmics

By PF Arcand - 14 Years Ago
Flow on stock & ported "G" heads is available in issue #96 of YBM. And flow numbers on the aluminum heads have been issued here recently, back a bit..
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
Oldmics (8/18/2010)
Can we get the air flow numbers on Johns new heads and also an air flow number on a set of stock "G" heads for comparison purposes?  Oldmics

 

Here’s what John said awhile back regarding flow numbers on ported iron heads

John Mummert (3/19/2010)
The upper port of almost any Y-Block head can be ported into the 210-215CFM range. The G, -113 and -471 heads can be ported to around 225CFM with 1.94" and 230's with 2.02" for both upper and lower. The problem with the less desirable heads is the lower. I've tried every trick I can think of and most won't reach 200CFM. The lower on the C head is one of the worst. High 190's is the best I've found. The C1AE can be made better with good porting and 1.88" valve,1.94" cut down to 1.88" to avoid spark plug interferrence. 

 

And here’s John talking about flow numbers on the unported and ported aluminum heads.

John Mummert (7/21/2010)
….The first heads sent to Ted flow in the 235 range.  Having ported more Y-Block heads than I can count we put most of the tricks in the new castings right out of the box. Granted, some material has to be left around pushrod holes and headbolt holes in case of core shift ect. The out of the box head also needs to work on a 300 cu in street engine. That was the goal. There are some things that can be done in a reasonable amount of time that will increase the flow into the 250-255 CFM  range but 270CFM requires non stock port openings and pushing every corner to near the limit. This takes a great deal of time.

At 270CFM the heads will run a 320 inch engine well into the 7000 RPM range. I wouldn't consider this with cast pistons, stock rods or main cap fasteners. That is why I felt that running the EMC heads on the mule engine was not a appropriate test since the redline would need to held well below the potential of the heads. A low compression 320 incher with an antique cam and low redline simply won't show the true potential of the EMC heads.

 

Doing a search on this site can bring up some other discussions.  Here’s a link to get you started.

http://www.y-blocksforever.com/forums/Topic41409-3-1.aspx