By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
Here are the dyno results where several sets of headers are tested on a 314” Y. Engine particulars include a 3.810” bore (+060 over 292 block), 312 crank with turned down mains, C2AE truck rods, ported ‘G’ heads, 12½:1 compression ratio with Dykes rings in the top lands, extrude honed Blue Thunder aluminum 4V intake, Isky 505-T cam with 254° @ 0.050” duration ground on 108° lobe centers and installed at 106° intake lobe centerline (2° advance), 1.6:1 Dove rockers, and a 830cfm Holley vacuum secondary carburetor sitting atop a 2” HiFlo spacer. Engine performance comparisons are made in the 2500-6800 rpm range. Here are some specifics on the headers involved in this test. - EMC headers – 1.750” X 1.875” stepped tubes with 3” merge collectors.
- Chrome drag car chassis headers – 1.750” tubes with 3½” collectors. Tested with 6” long 3½” diameter collector extensions and also with 27” long 3½” diameter collector extensions.
- Upswept dragster headers – 2” tubes with 3½” collectors
- Sanderson truck headers – 1½” diameter short length tubes with 2.375” collector openings.
- Fenderwell headers – Circle Track specials, 1.750” diameter & long tubes with 4” collectors.
- Fenderwell headers – Drag car specials, 1.625” diameter & long tubes with 3” collectors.
To keep the graphs from being too busy, they are broken down as two sets with the Sanderson headers being common on both graphs for comparison purposes.
Scoring is calculated from the 2800 thru 6800 rpms range and is as follows: Sanderson truck headers, 1½” tubes, 2.375” collectors - 1718 pts. EMC headers w/o mufflers (stepped tubes, 3” collector – 1715 pts. Upswept dragster headers w/2” tubes, 3½” collectors – 1702 pts. Chrome drag car chassis headers w/27” extension – 1700 pts. Fenderwell headers w/1.625” tubes, 3” collectors – 1692 pts. Chrome drag car chassis headers w/6” extension – 1690 pts. Fenderwell headers w/2” tubes, 4” collectors – 1679 pts.
|
By charliemccraney - 14 Years Ago
|
Any idea how old the Sandersons are? They don't show a 1.625", 3" collector on the website.
|
By Fordy Guy - 14 Years Ago
|
Nice results for the different headers. Have you had a chance to do any testing on the Thunderbird Specific headers? The 314 would be an excellent engine to work with.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
charliemccraney (11/12/2010) Any idea how old the Sandersons are? They don't show a 1.625", 3" collector on the website.Charlie. The Sanderson headers are on loan from Charlie Burns who might know more about their history or age. From their looks, they’ve been around for awhile. I’ve corrected the sizes for them above as they are 1½” tubes with a 2.375” collector opening. I’ll post some pictures in the next few days of the various headers which should clear up some of the questions about them.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
Fordy Guy (11/12/2010) Nice results for the different headers. Have you had a chance to do any testing on the Thunderbird Specific headers? The 314 would be an excellent engine to work with.Afraid I don’t have any Thunderbird specific headers here other than a very custom set supplied by Gary Burnette and those are a Tri-Y design and not a four tube design. I’m still gathering up parts and pieces though for extensive exhaust testing on the 322” dyno mule with ported G heads. This test will also include a variety of cast iron manifolds as well a myriad assortment of headers. Parts wise, this engine is closer to what many Saturday night cruisers are running but the ported heads are expected to help quantify the differences between some of the systems that will be tested.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
Here are pics of the various headers that were used in this particular test. EMC headers – 1.750” X 1.875” stepped tubes with 3” merge collectors. Chrome drag car chassis headers – 1.750” tubes with 3½” collectors. Tested with 6” longer 3½” diameter collector extensions and also with 27” longer 3½” diameter collector extensions. Upswept dragster headers – 2” tubes with 3½” collectors Sanderson truck headers – 1½” diameter short length tubes with 2.375” collector openings. Fenderwell headers – Circle Track specials, 1.750” diameter & long tubes with 4” collectors. Fenderwell headers – Drag car specials, 1.625” diameter & long tubes with 3” collectors
|
By charliemccraney - 14 Years Ago
|
Ted (11/12/2010) Charlie. The Sanderson headers are on loan from Charlie Burns who might know more about their history or age.
No need now that the size is cleared up. They seem to perform pretty well. I can't wait to see how they compare to the Red's stubbies and all of the others.
I chose Red's over Sanderson because the short and abrupt collector of the Sanderson just didn't look like it will work too well although it appears that the Sanderson header is mandrel bent (or use better tooling) whereas Red's is not.
|
By mctim64 - 14 Years Ago
|
Wow! the Sandersons didn't do too bad, and I wanted to replace them. These are the same type that is running on the Brick although this set came off of Steve Johnsons F-250 when he got a set of Mummert Ram Horns. I am going to re-do the 1 3/4" headers that we made for the Brick last summer so the will work on the new Uni LSR truck but I may want those Sandersons back instead.
|
By MarkMontereyBay - 14 Years Ago
|
Ted, I have a new set of Sanderson's for my 57 TBird that I purchased a couple months ago. They are still in the box and awaiting the delivery of Mummert's aluminum heads. If you want to test them let me know and I can ship them out to you.
|
By idaho211 - 14 Years Ago
|
Really appreciate the tests. Was wondering the comparison between the sanderson truck manifolds and the ram horns. Do you think the ram horns would have done better on the engine you tested the sandersons on? I wanted to get maximal flow on my 272 but like the ease of routing on the ram horns. Thank you.
|
By pcmenten - 14 Years Ago
|
Ted, thank you for posting these results.
Could I make a suggestion? Would it be possible to stretch the image of the graphs in the horizontal axis? That would make it easier to spot the differences in the curves.
Thanks.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
pcmenten (11/14/2010) ....Could I make a suggestion? Would it be possible to stretch the image of the graphs in the horizontal axis? That would make it easier to spot the differences in the curves.The horizontal axis is as large as the site will permit in being ‘500’ wide. Although the graphs view fine on my end, I can only imagine the number of different monitor and viewing properties/attributes used by other YBF forum viewers. Some better, some worse I’m sure. I did have the option of using Photobucket or another hosting site which would permit a larger horizontal viewing but I’d rather these graphs were permanent to the site and also sized where the text is not rolling off of the right side of the screen. Using an external host site leaves the potential for the graphs to eventually disappear from the site if the files at the host site are removed or renamed. From a site loading standpoint, I do still have room to stretch the vertical axis on the graphs. This would essentially make the graphs square; the Y axis (vertical) would then be the same size as the current X axis (horizontal). If stretching the vertical axis would help the viewing, then I can do that on future graphs. Just let me know.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
idaho211 (11/13/2010) ...Was wondering the comparison between the sanderson truck manifolds and the ram horns. Do you think the ram horns would have done better on the engine you tested the sandersons on? I wanted to get maximal flow on my 272 but like the ease of routing on the ram horns. Thank you.Gut feel says the Sandersons are going to outperform the Rams Horns except maybe in the very low rpm ranges. That same gut feel says the Rams Horns are going to be better than the ’57 & up cast iron manifolds but that will be verified in the ‘big’ exhaust test that’s coming up. The Sandersons thus far with their smaller tubes do work well on the engine combinations thus tested. But here’s a link to a 272 that was tested with the EMC headers and Rams Horns as that's the only Rams Horn test I have on file. Exhaust Testing – 272 Y-Block The torque differences in that test did not show a significant shift or advantage in a specific rpm range but the headers still outperform the Rams Horns generally in the whole of the rpm band in which both were tested. I’ll add that if the heads are stock, then dual exhaust is likely going to be the best bang for the buck while manifold or header changes are not going to see the big differences that will be seen if the heads are ported or a much larger camshaft is being used. As the breathing capabilities of the engine are improved or increased, then the need for a much better breathing exhaust system will come to the forefront.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
MarkMontereyBay (11/13/2010) Ted, I have a new set of Sanderson's for my 57 TBird that I purchased a couple months ago. They are still in the box and awaiting the delivery of Mummert's aluminum heads. If you want to test them let me know and I can ship them out to you.I’ll take you up on the offer on the header loan. The more the better at this point. Go to this website for contact info and/or a shipping address. http://www.eatonbalancing.com/ Here’s a list of exhaust tests that are in the planning stages thus far. Early single exhaust manfolds with crossover pipe and a length of 2” exhaust pipe. ’57 exhaust manifolds with dual exhaust pipes. Fenton exhaust manifolds with dual exhaust pipes. Rams Horn manifold with dual exhaust pipes. EMC headers w & w/o muffers and variety of exhaust extensions. Burnette T-Bird headers (shorty design and Tri-Y). Not firing order specific. Pickup Tri-Y headers with a Y specific firing order into the tubes. 1 5/8” tube fenderwell headers. 1 ¾” tube fenderwell headers. 1 ½” tube Sanderson pickup headers. 1 ½” tube shorty heades with square collectors. Reds two tube car chassis headers. Christenson 4 tube chassis headers. (shorty design)
|
By Glen Henderson - 14 Years Ago
|
Ted, if I can find a box, I will send you my cobbled together junk. I had planned on just bringing them when the engine is ready, but I would be interested in seeing how they compare to the others that you have on hand. I'll give you a call if and when I ship them.
|
By bird55 - 14 Years Ago
|
HI Ted, I'm running and have in use the Ford Power train Tbird headers that come out of Washington. (you know the ones Mummert has on his site) Any chance you might be able to test them. I might be able to loan mine if necessary.
|
By MarkMontereyBay - 14 Years Ago
|
Ted,
Good deal. I will get them out to you this week. I don't think the Tbird Sandersons will perform as well as the Sanderson truck shorties but hopeful they will do reasonably well.
|
By pegleg - 14 Years Ago
|
Ted for what it's worth.......thanks for your time effort and expense!
|
By mctim64 - 14 Years Ago
|
pegleg (11/15/2010)
Ted for what it's worth.......thanks for your time effort and expense! Yes! Thank you Ted! You give us so much info that we could not get on our own without great cost.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
Glen. It’s your call on sending the headers or not. They can be tested on your engine against another ‘known’ set and comparisons made that way. But if you send them, I’ll test them on the dyno mule with the other headers. Al. Same deal. If you send them I’ll include them in the test. Your call though as there are plenty of headers here now to test. Mark. Be sure to include a return shipping address and phone number in the box with the headers. Would like to get them back to you as soon after testing as possible.
|
By MarkMontereyBay - 14 Years Ago
|
Mark. Be sure to include a return shipping address and phone number in the box with the headers. Would like to get them back to you as soon after testing as possible.
Ted,
I shipped the 57 Tbird Sanderson headers this morning from California. There is an envelope with all my contact info in the box and I sent an email a few minutes ago to Eaton Balancing with the same info. Thanks.
|
By yalincoln - 14 Years Ago
|
hi ted, could you try a 800 cfm spreadbore double pumper once to see if it would bring the torque up at the lower rpm's and get rid of that dip. i think it might be when the vacumm comes in. i've always liked these carbs for milage, plus performance when you want it on the street. just a thought and only if it's not much trouble, thanks, wayne. P.S. use a four hole adaptor if you have it.
|
By Ted - 14 Years Ago
|
yalincoln (11/20/2010) hi ted, could you try a 800 cfm spreadbore double pumper once to see if it would bring the torque up at the lower rpm's and get rid of that dip. i think it might be when the vacumm comes in. i've always liked these carbs for milage, plus performance when you want it on the street. just a thought and only if it's not much trouble, thanks, wayne. P.S. use a four hole adaptor if you have it.Wayne. Afraid I don’t have any spreadbore Holleys here so that option is out. But I have tested vacuum secondary carbs against double pumpers and the vacuum secondary carbs when tuned properly and being equally sized outperform the double pumplers on the bottom end of the scale. They are equal on the topend of the scale all else being equal. The dip in the torque curve that’s observed with the EMC headers does go away when mufflers are added. The muffler part of the test is just not in this particular thread though. The Sanderson headers without mufflers had a very strong lowend torque curve without the lowend dip that’s evident with the larger collector sized headers. At this point, there’s a strong relationship in the lowend torque numbers and the collector exit size. Here’s the link to the thread including graphs for the 314 engine with EMC headers with and without the mufflers. Exhaust Testing – Mufflers versus No Mufflers
|