"Y" block land speed record


http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/Topic42042.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By pegleg - 14 Years Ago
Couple of recent drag race numbers also. Randy Gummelt and Bob's world record.  
By pegleg - 14 Years Ago
A y-block powered Gov't motors Car?
By pegleg - 14 Years Ago
 Would it follow that a Falcon Rancho would be considered production with the Y?
By pegleg - 14 Years Ago
Charlie,

        I thought maybe anything Ford sold in a vehicle would be legal. Since it's not you may as well use the slickest truck available, and that's most likely that Jimmy.

By MoonShadow - 14 Years Ago
How about the Torino Ranchero's aren't they pretty slick through the air? Or do they not count as a pickup? Just a thought. Chuck in NH
By MoonShadow - 13 Years Ago
I think Mythbusters did a segment on the tailgate issue and found that it really made no difference for everyday driving. They didn't test drag or LSR. Chuck in NH
By yfreak57 - 14 Years Ago
The Battle Bird.

http://www.tbirdsbygil.com/Battle%20Bird.htm

http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z15200/Ford-Battlebird.aspx

By glrbird - 14 Years Ago
Now that is quite a goal, I am sure you can get there. Have you figured what the  horsepower you will need to reach that goal?
By speedpro56 - 14 Years Ago
The battle bird went over 200 at Daytona I believe in 1957, i think it was around 211 mph one way with a blown 312.BigGrin
By speedpro56 - 14 Years Ago
I'm crying tooCrying
By pintoplumber - 14 Years Ago
What? is the 10 year plan now a 15 year plan?
By Hollow Head - 14 Years Ago
Charlie, I just started the clock and I'm waiting to hear some news... Tongue.

BTW, how is your Comet progressing?

By Hollow Head - 14 Years Ago
Sometimes reading the truth hurts BigGrin. Maybe he thought he would hold the record? Naah, just kidding... Some people are so busy that they don't even have time to hang around the computer like you and me, Tim Wink.
By Hollow Head - 14 Years Ago
Jyrki just send me this picture. I don't know where the ##ll he found this, but that Mad Dog II text on the front is strange to me. Nevertheless, two Thunderbids and '56 Ford at the front, couple of Mercurys at behind... great shot Smile. Daytona Beach?

By Hollow Head - 14 Years Ago
And Charlie... how's your Merc?
By Ketterbros - 14 Years Ago
I have a mag that states the Y was a dealer option, and show one installed in Fords personal vehicle..

Harry in Mesquite, TX

By yalincoln - 14 Years Ago
314, you're right it was a 368 lincoln, but it was bored and stroked to 430 cu in.    charlie, the 56 merc. was bored to 391 cu in and ran hilborn inj. and had a best run of 153.649mph.  also i read in the december 56 hot rod that jazzy jim nelson went 134mph at 10.30 et in the quarter with his 1700 lbs fiat body'd modifyed roadster on his first time out, he was using 75% nitro.
By yalincoln - 14 Years Ago
charlie, i just looked up the article in the november hot rod. farrington set the new record 200mph record with a 429 cu in 6-71 blown chrysler in his 56 bird. sorry.
By yalincoln - 14 Years Ago
i'm not very good at this.
By yalincoln - 14 Years Ago
good luck charlie, whatever you run.
By yalincoln - 14 Years Ago
say charlie, would a 61-62 long wheel base uni-body f-100 work better for production class, they look a little slippier than a 57?
By yalincoln - 13 Years Ago
yes, that's great, what class are going for? can you use a bed cover or drop the tail gate for less drag. mabey even use the tail gate like a air foil to keep the rear hooked up better at speed.    

     say charlie, are you alowed to run a bed cover that goes from the roof of the cab down to the tail gate since you GMC is modified?

 good luck to all, and happy new year.

By Y block Billy - 14 Years Ago
Frank,

They were limited to 1/4 mile, let them loose on a mile or more and I am sure some new milestones will be made by the Y.

By aussiebill - 14 Years Ago
Hoosier Hurricane (4/6/2010)
Back in Karol's era Knot Farrington was running a blown Y in a streamlined T-Bird, but I can't recall his speeds.  He later put a Chrysler Hemi in it.

And went slower??????? ha,ha.

By unibodyboy - 14 Years Ago
Slightly off topic Charlie, but speaking of your Comet, are you going to be undertaking any kind of fund raising activities for your Comet's run?
By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Great question.  Karol Miller has the most recognized speed record, but I'm sure there are other Y-Blocks that have gone faster in coupes or roadsters.  A colleague and mentor tells me of the days when he used to race a Y-Block in a 34 coupe.  He said they did something north of 170mph.

That is fast, but I believe there were probably even faster cars.  I talked to a youngster last year who was building a 32 roadster with a 671 blown Y and his goal was 200.  His father has landspeed experience and I don't doubt they will give it a good try.

Of course, there are no engine designations on the records set at landspeed events, so it would be hard to verify.  At any rate, it would be great to hear if anyone out there has reliable info on previously fast Y-Blocks (don't forget Australia).

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Gary,

I have to tell you, even with Jyrki's links, I had a hard time believing that a Y in a T-Bird could go 200 mph+ in 1957.  So, a little research was in order.

As a general rule of thumb, it takes about 700 to 800 hp to make 200 mph with a door slammer.  Aerodynamics of course makes a big difference.  With the small frontal plane of the BattleBird, I still felt like it would take at least 600 hp to generate that kind of speed.  Oh, me of little faith.

After a little google help, I found out that there were four T-Birds prepped for the 1957 Daytona SpeedWeek.  Two were in pretty much stock trim and factory power with no mention of "E or "F" code engines.  One went 135 and the other went 138.  Pretty good I'd say.

The third was a BattleBird and had 430 Lincoln power with no mention of induction.  It was driven by Danny Eames and set a record in B Modified Sports at 160.356.

The fourth bird was BattleBird #98 driven by Church Daigh.  The Y was stroked to 348 cu. in. and fed by Hilborn fuel injection.  There were no speed numbers given with an attempt to run naturally aspirated, but it is said that they added a supercharger and did just what you said.

According to the book "Thunderbird Milestones", by Mike Mueller and a report from the "Classic Thunderbird Club of Chicagoland", the #98 BattleBird did 205 mph on a down leg and broke on the return run and therefore no record was set.  As it is at Bonneville, the average of two passes were required within a period of time at Daytona to set a record.  And so the speed just became a footnote.

The report said that the addition of the supercharger while staying with the high compression just destroyed the engine.  No mention of changing the Hilborn unit or whether it was a blow thru or draw thru system.  There was no mention of the brand or type of supercharger either.

Well, that got my thinking up.  Let's keep looking (and trying), who knows, perhaps there is or will be even faster Ys.

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Seppo and Greg,

I am slowly, but steadily working on the Comet, I just haven't reached a point that is worthy of pictures to post, hopefully I will have something for you soon (keep an eye on the BonnevilleComet thread).

As for a fund raiser, nothing promotional wise is planned, but I have been selling quite a bit of the Y-Block stash (thanks to a lot of you.....and Tim) and that has helped me purchase new Goodyear landspeed tires, custom wheels, Moon wheel disks and a 14 point roll cage kit (yep....14 point) from Alston's Chassisworks.  I am currently finishing the front and rear suspension which includes front and rear anti-roll (sway) bars, and a rear watts link.

Thanks for asking..............Charlie

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Good point Billy.  The only thing is you have to keep it at WOT a lot longer and hopefully all that power stays inside the engine.  Then do it again for a backup!

I was visiting the Hilborn Fuel Injection office Friday and in the lobby were some great examples of older FI manifolds.  No Y-Block units, but there was a framed picture on the wall of a 56 Merc from the October 1956 Hot Rod Magazine.  It claimed 152 mph with a famed Hilborn FI setup.  If anyone has the issue, perhaps you can shed some light on the car.

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
"Back in Karol's era Knot Farrington was running a blown Y in a streamlined T-Bird, but I can't recall his speeds.  He later put a Chrysler Hemi in it."

John - "The Hoosier Hurricane"

John, I was catching up on a back issue of Y-Block Magazine (July-August 1999, #33) and Jerry Christenson reported that he read in the July 1960 issue of Hot Rod Magazine that Farrington's '56 T-Bird went 173.41 at Bonneville.  The HR magazine article said he had a 342 cu. in. Y-Block with a McCulloch supercharger fed by 3x2s.  Farrington's Y-Block was estimated at 400 hp. (Jerry thought that was conservative).

I still think there could have been faster speeds out there.  I'll keep looking..........By the way, you were quite the contributor your self back then.  I have enjoyed a number of your articles.

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Seppo.

Thanks for asking about the Merc.  I haven't been posting anything for a few months because of some technical problems logging in.  Jim Culver fixed that today.

Actually, the Comet is on hold.  I have every intention to finish it, but currently I have switched horses in the middle of the stream.  The new project is still Y-Block powered, but the truck (can't get away from trucks) is surely going to raise a few eyebrows.  I started it from scratch, but it is now much farther along than the Merc and I will post some pictures when I get brave enough to show it.

Charlie

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Frank,

Tim is correct about the Y in a Falcon Ranchero not qualifying for the production class.  I didn't explain it well enough earlier when I stated that the production class required an engine available from the factory in the year of the body.  I should have added "available in that body style".  The rule book says that Rancheros and El Caminos can run in either pickup or car classes, but the car classes are much faster.

Although it would be cool to run a Falcon, if you wanted to be competitive it would be difficult without going to the newer supercharger classes.  The naturally aspirated classes have some impressive speeds.  In E/Production mini pickup (sbf 260 carb or injection) the record is 184 set in 1989.  This is the same Banks truck we saw in Charlie's earlier post.  I'm not sure, but I think the reason it went over 200 in a car class was because he used some kind of fuel and fuel would require it to be moved to a car class.  In D/Production mini pickup (perhaps a sbf 302) the record is 173 set in 2010. (there's a possibility) 

With a naturally aspirated Y in the falcon, it would be in the modified mini pickup class.  Current records there for E/MMP (a 258 cu. in. like ours) is 187 set in 1999, D/MMP (perhaps a .060 over 292 or some other configuration) is 204 set in 2006.  Both of these records were set by Bob Jucewic and he is the one who told me it would take about 650hp to go 200 in a mini pickup.  By the way his race car was a LUV long wheel base.  I think it would be fun in a Falcon (wheel base about 105") up to about 150, but after that the fun would disappear until you successfully finished.  This Jimmy I'm building has 123" WB. (still not sure what north of 150 will feel like!)  

It is in the newer modified and supercharged mini pickup class (no fuel allowed in any pickup class) that a mini pickup could be competitive at this time.  As I have mentioned earlier the E/blown modified mini pickup (E/BMMP) record is still open, no matter what speed you ran, it would be a record.  The same with D/BMMP.  However, the C/BMMP record is currently 177 set in 2008 (C is 306 to 373 cu. in.).  So this is where I am headed with the Y-Block.  I'm hoping to set or better any new records set in E or D and try to make it all the way to a record of 200+ in the C/BMMP class. (hence, a red hat)

By 57FordPU - 13 Years Ago
Nice photoshop job.  Now you and Todd should show them the real thing!  You guys are doing some great work there and you should share it.
By 57FordPU - 13 Years Ago
Good question about the bed cover.  In modified, you can do some things different than in production, but not as much as you might think.  The bed cover rules for modified pickup are the same as production pickup.  You can cover the bed but no higher than the bed rails and the rules say that it can have no aerodynamic advantage.  You can run with the tailgate up, down or off.  I never thought of running the tail gate at 45* to give you some kind of spoiler or wing effect.  The bed cover is best, but if you felt you had enough run opportunities, you could do experimental runs?
By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
That's funny, but I ain't gettin' any younger so I thought I'd better go to plan "C" before I don't feel like crawling around and under a race car.  Plan "B" was an intermediate goal of about 160 mph in a passenger car.  This truck will be for the last goal of the 10 year plan and earn a red hat.

By the way, our internet was down most of yesterday and we hope you had a great birthday. 

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
The 57 pickup would probably need 2000 hp!  I have talked with a number of successful Bonneville racers who hold records in similar classes to the ones I am after.  They have similar trucks to the one I hope to field next summer and the consensus is it will take between 650 to 700 hp.
By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Charlie,

The Gale Banks S-15 Sonoma was an interesting first link.  I talked to Gale at the 2007 SEMA show and we talked about the wind tunnel testing he did for the tail gate and bed cover research.  We talked about the 57 and he gave me some ideas to try.

This was a first generation S-10/S-15 and it was a little "boxy".  They were actually running it in a car class which is available to pickups, but not usually the best choice.

I say all that to say this.  The new land speed race car I am building is a 1998 GMC S-15 extended cab pickup.  I wouldn't say Gale was an inspiration for this, but I am hoping this second generation model will be quite a bit more aerodynamic.  You might ask why I am not using a Ranger, and the answer is this pickup was given to me by a friend and the budget just wouldn't allow the purchase of another car.

I will start a new thread to show the progress soon.............

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
It is OK to rib me about this, I've got a thick skin. I can't wait to see the expressions on the GM guys' faces.



This reminds me of the old joke about the two guys in the men's room.



This guy was at the urinal and a second guy with a very large member came up to the adjacent unit and looked over at him. The second guy asked, "Who are you going to please with that?" Then the first guy thought a second and said..................."ME!"
By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Thanks Hotrod, I appreciate the support.

John, the sedans and pickups have two basic divisions. 

Production (along with many other requirements) needs to have an engine block that was available from the factory during the model year of the body.  Aftermarket heads are OK if they have the same configuration.

Modified can have any engine and head configuration you want as long as it wasn't available during the model year of the body.

These are very simple and incomplete distinctions between production and modified, but I hope it answers the questions about the engine.   

If I am successful in putting together a turbo Y (Tim/Reed) the truck will run in three different classes.  First will be E/BMMP.  E motor (under 260 cu. in.) blown modified mini pickup.  The second will be D/BMMP.  D motors are 261-305 cu. in.  The last class will be C/BMMP.  C motors are 306-373 cu. in.  A "C" motor is the largest they will allow in mini pickups.  I guess they are trying to keep the speed down (good luck).

These blown pickup classes are so new there are a number of "open" classes, meaning no one has attempted a record in that class to date.  Both E and D classes have no record yet, but I expect someone to set them during the 2011 season.  The C/BMMP has a current record of 177 mph.  I believe the Y can be very competitive in all three classes and if all the stars line up just right, with about 600 + hp I can reach my goal of a red hat.

By 57FordPU - 14 Years Ago
Chuck,

The Torino Ranchero was a good thought.  I have considered them, but I didn't believe they would get me where I want to go.  My brother has one and if I twisted his arm I think he would donate it.

They didn't have Y-blocks available, so it would be in the modified class with a Y.  It can run in either the car or pickup classes.  However, it would be classified as a full size pickup and with a turbo motor that I would like to run, it would have some steep competition.  The three class records for E, D, and C blown, full size trucks are all owned by Wayne Jesel from your coast.  He runs a new four door full size Dodge Ram pickup with a turbocharger on basically NASCAR MOPAR motors.  The records he holds in E, D, and C are; 225, 262, and 248 mph respectively.  By the way, the car classes are all faster than that.

I talked to Wayne at Bonneville and told him to stay away from the mini-pickup classes, he just smiled.

By mctim64 - 14 Years Ago
I just noticed that the guy who originaly asked this question has not checked since he first posted. Hehe  Funny that is atleast the second time I've seen that on this forum.  Wonder why people do that? Tongue
By mctim64 - 14 Years Ago
I understand Charlie! Wink
By mctim64 - 14 Years Ago
pegleg (12/26/2010)
 Would it follow that a Falcon Rancho would be considered production with the Y?

I don't think a Falcon came from the factory with a Y.  You could use a SBF (260) or a 250 six and run in the E class though.  I'm guessing that the early Falcon/Ranchero could run in car or truck?  Charlie?  I know they have been at Bonneville since they were introduced.

By mctim64 - 13 Years Ago
yalincoln (12/31/2010)
say charlie, would a 61-62 long wheel base uni-body f-100 work better for production class, they look a little slippier than a 57?

You mean like this? Wink

bla bla bla

By BIGREDTODD - 14 Years Ago
Tim & I sure hope so!

http://fordtruk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=19250

yalincoln (12/31/2010)
say charlie, would a 61-62 long wheel base uni-body f-100 work better for production class, they look a little slippier than a 57?
 
By ecode ragtop - 14 Years Ago
CHARLIE, THE 56 MERC. WAS NICK NAMED THUMPER AND IT HAD A 368 LINCOLN Y BLOCK , I BELIEVE ROYCE WAS BUILDING A CLONE TO MATCH THIS 368 POWERED 57 MERC. THE MERMAID. I HAVE THE ARTICLE AND IF ROYCE DOESN'T JUMP IN I WILL POST MORE ABOUT IT. TOM
By ecode ragtop - 14 Years Ago
I TOLD THE KIDS TODAY THAT THERE WAS NO SANTA CLAUS, AND THEY WERE ALL RIGHT WITH THAT. THEN I TOLD THEM CHARLIE BURNS WAS BUILDING A GOVERMENT MOTORS COMPANY (G.M.C.) RACE TRUCK , AND THEY ARE STILL CRYING!!
By 314 - 14 Years Ago
i believe that other bird had a 368 not 430.
By machanist1 - 14 Years Ago
Who holds the "Y" block land speed record, any one know?
By Hoosier Hurricane - 14 Years Ago
Back in Karol's era Knot Farrington was running a blown Y in a streamlined T-Bird, but I can't recall his speeds.  He later put a Chrysler Hemi in it.
By Hoosier Hurricane - 14 Years Ago
Charlie:

Do the rules permit engine swaps such as this, or are you shooting for a class other than Production Pickup? 

By Hoosier Hurricane - 13 Years Ago
I read or heard somewhere that wind tunnel testing of a pickup with the tailgate open and closed showed that the closed gate caused a large air bubble to be carried in the bed, and the moving air passed over it with little resistance.  Shot down the theory of running trucks at the drags with the gate down.  Of course, a lowered gate moved a little weight to the rear for traction help, and some gates were found to have added weight in them.
By Hoosier Hurricane - 13 Years Ago
After further deliberation, it may have been Gordon Payne who told me about the testing, by Ford engineering, to evaluate fuel mileage, a big concern by the manufacturers with the government setting fuel economy goals. 
By charliemccraney - 14 Years Ago
I don't think the dragster setup will be best for the salt. I imagine it wouldn't handle right, and all of the dust kicked up by the front tires will shorten the life of the engine dramatically.
By charliemccraney - 14 Years Ago
Some 200mph trucks.



http://www.highperformancetrucks.com/trucks/truck_view.php?id=130

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/hrdp_1002_1949_studebaker_truck/index.html
By charliemccraney - 14 Years Ago
I saw that S-15 and remembered that you said it will raise some eyebrows.  I began to wonder if you are going to put a Y in a far newer GM product.