By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
Here is a Short video of Charlies truck at Maxton, NC last Sept on his record run. There is a little smoke at the end, He told me he over filled the crankcase by accident and it came out the road draft tube all over the "H" pipe. The horn you hear is the call for the fire truck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-B0VgRE_8M&feature=channel_page
|
By bird55 - 16 Years Ago
|
Just always wondered this? Would it matter if Charlie's truck had a Slickside bed or is it a class thing. Like i said just wondering about aero stuff. (out of my element) I guess a wind tunnel would be the only sure way to tell.
|
By bird55 - 16 Years Ago
|
BTW, Tim thanks for posting that, it sounds great!
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
bird55 (2/7/2009) Just always wondered this? Would it matter if Charlie's truck had a Slickside bed or is it a class thing. Like i said just wondering about aero stuff. (out of my element) I guess a wind tunnel would be the only sure way to tell.It's a stepside because that is what he had. 
|
By bird55 - 16 Years Ago
|
I get that.
|
By MoonShadow - 16 Years Ago
|
I bet he appreciates that "extra long" shut down area! Chuck in NH
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Hey!...........I resemble that remark! Hi, Chuck, actually I used every inch of the .9 mile shut down lane (especially because it was a dog leg right!). Alan, you are exactly right. A straight side bed would be much more aerodynamic, but it just wouldn't look like the ones I have been driving since 1961. You just cannot change something you drove in high school. It is a small handicap for Tim McMaster, but so far he has overcome it. Built in 1961 ("D" code 312) 
Built in 1972 ("D" code 312) 
Built in 1983 ("E" code 312) 
Built in 2007 ("???" code 258)
Of course they were all Y-Block powered........
|
By MoonShadow - 16 Years Ago
|
I'll bet that dog leg has caused some excitement over the years! Couldn't resist the "shut down" crack. Not that anything sill has ever happened in my life! It would be interesting to see a little airflow test on the Yellow Brick. By the time you push that flat nose through the air I wouldn't think much would be near enough to be disrupted by the rear fender flow. Probably look something like one of the early space capsules on re entry. I wonder what a shed, a big fan, and a smoke source would show? Chuck in NH PS still proud as heck of ya!
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Thanks Chuck.............I hope you continue with that good sense of humor when you see the DVD I am making of Columbus 2008. You and I both made the blooper clip. Win, lose or draw, 2009 will be the last season for the Flying Yellow Brick, so no body modifications are in store. Tim is in the middle of a new 258 cu. in. engine (bigger cam, lighter valve train, better flowing heads and more compression) and our goal is 130 (the fastest time last year was 124.635 at Bonneville and the latest record there is a little over 126). Next on the drawing board is a 1961 Mercury Comet (just because I have one). It will have a turbo (get ready Reed) 258 cu. in. Y-Block and the current record for the E/CBGC is 152 and change (E is under 260 cu. in., C is Classic-1981 and older body, B is blown, GC is gas coupe -meaning it has an engine swap, no body modifications and on gasoline). The record has stood since 1999 and is owned by Gail Banks Engineering. Setting a record here would be difficult, but another class with a larger Y-Block would be more difficult and out of my budget range. I just want to go as fast as I can with a Y-Block and still be competitive. By the way, for the 2009 season and beyond, I will be flying your "Y-Blocks Forever" plaque and Lon's Australian license plate.
|
By Reed P - 16 Years Ago
|
Did somebody say...........turbo 
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
Here's another Video of Charlies truck on the dyno. Enjoy!  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8kiGC6tmQg&feature=channel_page
|
By Hollow Head - 16 Years Ago
|
Great video! Post us some more. Love the sounds at 7000 rpm.
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
Did you see the run at Bonneville? Just posted it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08JmrQy8zdc&feature=channel_page
|
By Johnson Rod - 16 Years Ago
|
Tim,
Nice video of the record run.
Also enjoyed the video on the pressurized rockers. My rockers are not pressurized but the overflow tube is restricted so I guess I'm somewhere in the middle. Next time around I may try the pressurize route. Since I have Dove rollers (expensive) I think the pressure system might be better.
Keep up the excellent work.
|
By speedpro56 - 16 Years Ago
|
I've run my rockers pressurized for years with no problems. Put a restricter in the bottom of the rocker pedstal, blocked off the ends tubes, and the oil pressure seems to be better for it as well. Now I do it to all my y-blocks.
|
By Ted - 16 Years Ago
|
Click here for more on Oil Mods
|
By Hollow Head - 16 Years Ago
|
Reed P, I think that was a misspell and it should have been "Turbos"... 

  
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
Nice!!!!
|
By Reed P - 16 Years Ago
|
You know what they say...the only thing better than a turbo engine is a TWIN TURBO engine 
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Speed Dreamin, First, welcome to the site. There are lots of interesting discussions going on here and I am sure you will be entertained and enlightened. Thanks for the comment. One thing I have noticed is that the firing order of the Y-Block sure makes a different (and in my opinion, better) sound than just about any other engine I hear out there. Yes/No, The BNI only gives a trophy to the last record set in each class at the end of the week. We set the record on Tuesday and had to leave for Columbus, OH for the Y-Block Nationals and Shoot Out. The previous record holder was there and wasn't able to keep our pace until later in the week when he took the record back (hence, the trophy went to him). Yes, they did recognize our record and sent us a nice plaque. So, we're still in the hunt to be the last one standing in August. It is one of those "just wait till next year" deals. By the way, the entry name for that other record holder is also "Speed Dreamin", is this really you Roy???
|
By Hollow Head - 16 Years Ago
|
57fordpu, off topic, but in what class would a efi fuel injected twin turbo 292 y-block go with for example '60 Ford Starliner body and what would be the record to break? Not that I'm intending to attend, but...
|
By glrbird - 16 Years Ago
|
Isn't Banks the turbo guy? They have a lot of money to throw at it. The pictures of the trucks, is that a 57 hood with a 60 grill and headlights?
|
By aussiebill - 16 Years Ago
|
Hi charlie, nice to read of another Y-BLOCK pioneer and your exploits, great work! Have you seen the nice photo of your truck in Feb 09 GOODGUYS magazine, nearly 1/2 page! Thought you may like to know. Theres and old saying that i think about when i read of your trucks great results with that little engine; "Run what you brung and hope you brung enough!" . best regards, Aussie Bill.
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Roy, We haven't talked since Bonneville, so, congratulations on your latest record. I really meant it when I told you "good luck" as we were leaving, you just don't give up and you deserve it. However, we will be back and doing our best. Glad you like the site, these are really good people. Look for a PM soon.
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Seppo, what are you dreamin' up? It is nice to think about these things, I do it all the time. Interesting you should ask about these classes as this is my next area of classifications with a Y-Block (2009 will be the last year for the truck). I will try to keep it short, but I need to write a little to spell it out. Stock type coupes and sedans run in two basic categories, "classic" (1981 and earlier) and "regular" (they really don't use that word), (Usually 1982 and up) (most often Cameros, Firebirds and sometimes late model T-Birds). I don't know exactly how many years ago it split like that but it was around 2000. It gives the less aerodynamic bodies a chance to run in their own group. In your case the EFI is not allowed in the classic category unless it is OEM. That means you would be placed in the regular classes and the records for your dream machine would be in that area. 292 cu. in. would be in the "D" class, the turbos would be considered "Blown", with no blowers available in 1960, you would have to run "Gas Coupe" instead of production. Your class would be D/BGC. The record currently is 265 and change, set in 2003. Mechanical fuel injection or carbs would allow you to run classic and that would be D/CBGC. The current record there is 209 plus set in 1980 by our friend Gail Banks. Our older friend Karol Miller, went just over 150 in 58 with this same kind of setup, Latham Blower (with carbs) and 259 cu. in. In 1956 he went 139 plus with a 312 E-code and in 1957 he went 150 plus with a 302 E-code (as per articles I have read). Too much information and hard to believe? Yeah, but with new technology and deep pockets, these guys can do unbelievable things. Besides that, the current engines are almost all aftermarket parts (blocks to heads). Probably the only thing from the "factory" is a thermostat housing. By the way, this is gas, fuel adders start a "whole nother" conversation (and higher speeds).
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Gary, Banks is the turbo guy alright. He is into everything now (especially trucks) including NASCAR. I met him in Las Vegas a year ago and he shared some wind tunnel (legal for my class) info that he thought would help my truck. I have not been able to adapt it yet, but I will for this season. All of the trucks that you saw were 57's. The first three had 58 grilles because I liked the quad headlights better. However, now that I am racing a 57 I thought it would be more nostalgic to run the correct grille. Thanks for asking............
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Aussiebill, Thanks for the comments and heads up on the magazine. Actually the March issue of GoodGuys Magazine has more pictures. Classic Trucks had a nice picture and caption in their March issue and the editor told me that there would be more as they picked us for an award at the Texas Loan Star Nationals car show in October of 2008. I'm told there is still other magazines that will run pictures and information soon. Please note that there would be no success without the help of engine builder Tim McMaster. Not only does he design and build the power for this thing, he also calls quite often and makes sure I am on the ball with finishing touches. Thanks again...................
|
By Hollow Head - 16 Years Ago
|
57FordPu, thanks about that info about classes. So, you won't be seeing us racing at Bonneville . About aerodynamics. How about flat aluminum sheet under the car with Formula One style ground effects and diffusors to direct air and to generate suction to keep the car steady at high speeds. And installing radiator horizontally to the bed with fans sucking air from under the car to create more downforce. I might be wrong, but for me it seems that your car "travelled" quite a bit at speeds on that video clip. Is it about the tyres or the grip or the tracks on the salt?
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Seppo, Good question about aerodynamics. Pickups are handcuffed as to body changes. There are only two categories, production and modified. Modified basically means an engine swap to something that was not available during the production year for your vehicle. The rules specifically state that you cannot use belly pans, change the location of the radiator, no air ducts, no vents, no vortex generators, no spoilers, and no changes in body panels (cannot even cut a hole in the bed). Only in "modified" can you use a front bumper air dam. The only hole allowed in the body is to add a hood scoop. Changing any of these rules will put you with the faster (much more aerodynamic) coupe and sedan altered classes. This is one of the reason the records are so much lower in the pickup categories. Good eye on the movement of the truck at speed. Most cars move sideways quite a bit during the highspeed portion of the run especially later in the event when ruts from high hp vehicles make the track surface a little uneven. If you are fortunate to be among the first to race on a new surface, it most likely will run straight and true. Other reasons for the movement are soft spots, car aerodynamics, and the rearend trying to drive around the front end. When viewing cars from the side, they look like they are running straight, but if you saw an aerial view, you would be surprised at the movement (fish tailing and drifting). I asked lots of questions about handling and the old timers warned me not to correct much during a run. They said if it wants to drift, let it drift, and it will eventually come back. Sounds good, but the pucker factor gets a little high the closer you get to the cones. You probably hear quite a bit about spins. The two main reasons are over correcting and the rear trying do drive around the frontend (and who wants to lift on the throttle?).
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Got a great private message from Charlie M. He was thoughtfully (without being public on the forum) trying to ask a question about my possibly bending the rules on the race truck. He noticed that I molded in the gas filler neck hole on the side of the cab. Thanks Charlie, I never even thought of it. But not to worry, the rules (there are so many) state that you must remove the gas tank from inside the pickup cab. So, when you remove the tank, you also remove the filler neck and the hole that is left open now must be closed. I did have a problem once when I was trying to increase the pressure behind the rear window. I ran the exhaust up into the bed just behind the cab in an attempt to shoot big holes in the low pressure area (interesting idea huh?). When the tech inspectors saw it, their eyes got real big . However after a huddled conference, they said that it was a grey area due to the exhaust rules (another long story) and that they wouldn't stop me from running. They also said that if another entry (that means you Roy ) protested, they wouldn't guarantee I would have much of a leg to stand on (protests do happen, but I have never seen one). Long story short, I removed it. Please feel free to ask questions or recommend your ideas. You know how it is, when you are so close, it is easy to overlook something. Besides, 2008 was our first full year of racing and we are still learning every day.
|
By pcmenten - 16 Years Ago
|
The talk about aerodynamics of trucks got me to thinking about my 53 Studebaker. It has a somewhat more aerodynamic shape than the 54 Ford that I have. I think there was an OHV V8 of about 244 ci for the 53 Studebaker. It looks like the 54 Studebaker is even better as a potential race truck.
I'll have to download the rules to see what the possibilities are. I already have too many projects, but it's fun to think about what could be done. Someone local is trying to sell his 55 'Baker truck 289 engine and 3sp/OD together with a 56 parts engine and transmission.
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Paul, You are on the right track (but you have to run a Y-Block in it). Norris Anderson (#898) goes just under 200mph with his AA/MP. It is over 500 cu. in., and he currently holds the record at Bonneville. 
You hit the nail on the head. It is fun just to see what is possible. Remember, "first you say it, then you do it" (I think that expression started about dung ). Also, the saying is true if you think about me, "Heck, if he can do it, anybody can do it".
|
By pcmenten - 16 Years Ago
|
Charlie, Thanks for the kind words. I'm going to look at those engines tomorrow with the intention of putting one into my 53. Because I have other vehicles, I can afford to ease my way into building this one. From what I read about how you approached racing, you chose a class partially based on what was affordable; a small cubic inch class in the pickup truck category. You read the rule book and then made your plans. Pretty smart way to go.
I wish I could use a y-block in the Studebaker, but I don't want to get into a class that's too competitive. But with what I've learned about y-blocks, I think I can do a decent job with the Studebaker.
The seller is only asking $400 for two engines; one that's running but has low oil pressure, and another that's parts. And two 3sp/OD transmissions. And some other 12volt conversion parts. Seems like a reasonable deal.
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
pcmenten (2/19/2009) The talk about aerodynamics of trucks got me to thinking about my 53 Studebaker. It has a somewhat more aerodynamic shape than the 54 Ford that I have. I think there was an OHV V8 of about 244 ci for the 53 Studebaker. It looks like the 54 Studebaker is even better as a potential race truck.
I'll have to download the rules to see what the possibilities are. I already have too many projects, but it's fun to think about what could be done. Someone local is trying to sell his 55 'Baker truck 289 engine and 3sp/OD together with a 56 parts engine and transmission.Studebaker did make a 259ci V8, not sure if it was out in '53 though, that would put you right in class. I have another friend that thought of this when he heard what Charlie was doing. 
|
By PF Arcand - 16 Years Ago
|
Studebaker's first OHV V-8 came out in the 1951 Commander model. Their low price field model was the Champion. The engine was 232 cu. inches. Next it was upped to 259 (in 1953?) and lastly to 289 cu.inches. I don't have any experience with those engines, but have been told they were solid designs. In the NASCAR chronicle a 51 coupe is pictured twice, driven by Frank Mundy. He took 4 poles & won three races..
|
By Glen Henderson - 16 Years Ago
|
The 53 Studes( cars and trucks) are the best looking vehicles of the era in my opinion. I remember something about one running in the Mexican road race. I think it was Ak Miller that put it in his T roadster race car and ran the race. Seems at the time OHV engines over 260 ci were not allowed, to keep it a flathead class, but they forgot about the 256 ford and the stude engines. I thing I read this in a Hot Rod mag back in the late fifties, so if anyone has those old mags, maybe they can check my memory.
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
The Studebakers were good solid engines. the 352 Packard V8 of 1955 was the most powerful engine (off the showroom floor) in it's day and was also a Studebaker desgin.
|
By 55Birdman - 16 Years Ago
|
I had a 53 studebaker back in the early days with that Packard engine in it. Great engine. But, in retrospect I should have left it stock. Oh well...
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Hey Roy, Thanks for the tip on cleaning up the undercarriage. That is something I never thought about. I have a good mental image of the bottom of the truck and I'm going over it now. I don't see anything major, however, like you said, every little bit helps an you bet I will be under it tomorrow looking for anything that can be eliminated. That is a great testament for using belly pans. That was the first thing Seppo from Finland had suggested. Too bad they are outlawed in the pickup classes. Very interesting about the 62 unibody (I have not run into him). (Did you see that Charlie M? By the way Charlie, the record for D/PP at Maxton is 120.000, set in April, 2006 and they are liberal on the safety rules for that speed, I don't think they even require a roll cage or 5-point harness, but better ask). If the unibody is in D/PP he must be running a 292 as the cubic inch limit for "D" is 305.99. If you run into him in your home state of Washington, invite him to log on and share with us. I know what you mean about gear ratios. I started with 3.25 (what a rookie!), then worked my way through 3.73, 3.89 skipped 4.11 and went to 4.33 and finally found the sweet spot. Tire changes has fine tuned the final drive ratio from there. When I tell people about the 4.33's, they get a scrunched up look on their face. That little 258 just needs a lot of breathing room. If I had four or five hundred hp, it would be a different story. For anyone reading this that has not read all the threads, Roy is a MOPAR man and the current record holder in the class I run in (E/PP). As you can see, people on the salt (just like the Y-Block forum group) will do whatever they can to help a fellow racer, even in the same class. I see you read that 2009 will be the last season for the truck. It will be turned out to pasture (back on the streets). It was a street rod for over 20 years and I believe it has another 20 in er' (question is, do I?). After the truck, I will run a sedan. It is very difficult to stay focused on the current season coming up when my mind wanders to what we want to accomplish in the next life for the Y-Block. Dreamin' isn't bad, I join dreamers like Seppo, Paul, Charlie M, Reed, Alan, Chuck, Tim, (you too Roy) and with enough hard work, perseverance and dogged determination, who knows what we can come up with (oh yes, a sponsor or two would be nice) (Social Security only goes so far). Thanks again Roy,
|
By MoonShadow - 16 Years Ago
|
Now, what is the slickest body a y-block ever came in? Maybe the 61 Starliner? But I think they are heavy too aren't they? The slicker body you can start with the easier it will be to go really fast. I wonder if any of the old time NASCAR Ford guys could give some pointers here? They surely know what cut through the air the best. Chuck in NH PS social security dosen't provide much in the way of sponsorship funds. Although we could talk about doing some decals or bumper stickers to peddle along the way? That I can work on.
|
By Hollow Head - 16 Years Ago
|
 MoonShadow, this is for you. Don't know if this is Y powered but sure looks fine . About that under the car shielding. All the new Mercedes Benz cars ( and all the rest too ) have plastic shields under the car to improve aerodynamics and to make them more silent. Fuel effiency gets better and better and all this reduces pollution. How green are we? 
|
By 57FordPU - 16 Years Ago
|
Chuck, Thanks for the sticker idea. We should work on that. Perhaps even the Y-Blocks Forever plaques. I will PM you to discuss it. We have been selling "Burns Brothers Racing" t-shirts, but we need to get the cost down a little to be able to sell them on-line. If it were me, I wouldn't pay over $20 for a shirt and after shipping there just wouldn't be enough profit left. We are currently out and there are some design tweeks and an update on the records being made.
Seppo, I sent you a PM...................Thanks guys
|
By pcmenten - 16 Years Ago
|
57FordPU (2/20/2009) Hey Roy,
I know what you mean about gear ratios. I started with 3.25 (what a rookie!), then worked my way through 3.73, 3.89 skipped 4.11 and went to 4.33 and finally found the sweet spot. Tire changes has fine tuned the final drive ratio from there. When I tell people about the 4.33's,they get a scrunched up look on their face. That little 258 just needs a lot of breathing room. If I had four or five hundred hp, it would be a different story.
Wow. I was convinced that it would take a 3.00 or 3.25 to run at those speeds. I guess that 4.11 I snagged will be the place to start.
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
Those high ratios are for engines that are big on torque. the little ones, like Charlies, need to spin high to get the speed.
|
By mctim64 - 16 Years Ago
|
Here is a video clip of all three record runs by Charlie Burns and "the Flyin' Yellow Brick" for 2008, also as mentioned in the classifieds we now have the T-shirts for sale to help with the financing of next years car. 
T-Shirts here http://yblockguy.com/yblocksell.htm Enjoy! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwJjzLgd1Kc
|
By BFOOTER03 - 16 Years Ago
|
Tim, nice video and shirts. Guess what I will be asking for fathers day this year??
|