Temperature Gauge Sending Unit Cylinder Head Bushing


http://forums.y-blocksforever.com/Topic163595.aspx
Print Topic | Close Window

By 55blacktie - Last Year
Someone just informed me that the 55/56 temperature sending unit is larger than the 57. The 55/56 is 3/8 NPT. I want to retain the 55 gauge and sending unit, but I will be using 57 "G" heads. It was suggested that the 57 sending unit bushing be drilled and tapped for the 55 sending unit. However, Concours sells the 3/8 NPT bushing. Is the OD of the 55/56 bushing the same as the 57? I would just as soon remove the 57 bushing and install the 55/56. 
By Hoosier Hurricane - Last Year
Yes, they are the same O.D.
By 55blacktie - Last Year
Thanks, John. If the 55/56 sender is 3/8 NPT, is the 57 sender 1/4 NPT? If that's the case, it would be easier (and cheaper) to use a 1/4 to 3/8 NPT adapter. 
By miker - Last Year
IIRC, the business end of the early temp sender is bigger than the later sender opening. You seem to be very care and precise in your work. Pull the bushing using the tool Concourse sells, clean out any corrosion, and install the larger one. It’ll look better, probably read better, and you’ll be happier in the long run.
By 55blacktie - Last Year
Thanks, Miker. I found the bushing puller on several sites. Is there any trick to installing the bushing? What sealer is recommended?
By paul2748 - Last Year
Just make sure the bung/bushing is going in straight.  I used a little RTV when I did mine,  but something like Permatex Aviation should work good.

55blacktie (2/17/2023)
Thanks, Miker. I found the bushing puller on several sites. Is there any trick to installing the bushing? What sealer is recommended?


By 55blacktie - Last Year
Is the bushing pressed in/tapped in? I have concerns about the possibility of damaging/cracking the head around the area of the bushing during removal/installation. Also, as I mentioned to Ted, I know that the original temperature gauge is not very accurate. Considering that AutoMeter includes adapters with their gauge, how detrimental will using an adapter be? By the way, I will be using AutoMeter gauges in addition to the original 55 gauges. The AutoMeter temp sending unit is installed in an upper radiator hose adapter, near the thermostat housing, where Ted says I'll get a better reading than from the location at the back of the head. 
By charliemccraney - Last Year
The bushing is pressed into the head
By miker - Last Year
IIRC, because it’s been years, I screwed a brass nipple into the bushing and used it as a handle to line things up and then carefully tapped it in. I probably finished with a steel nipple. I don’t remember it being a problem, and I know I didn’t use a press.
By paul2748 - Last Year
I did not us a press either.  Just tapped in it..  The head was still on the engine, which was in the car.
By Ted - Last Year
While I prefer that the temperature sending unit is at the front of the engine, it does still need to be behind the thermostat.  Installing the temperature sending unit in the upper radiator hose will have the temperature gauge reading at a much lower than actual temperature until the thermostat actually opens.  In the case of where the temperature probe or sending unit is installed in the hose and if the thermostat were to fail, the engine would be overheating long before the temperature gauge would indicate that.

Not sure why you are wanting to put the 6V temperature sending unit back in place when you could just use the ’57 and up ¼” NPT unit in the existing ¼” NPT bung.  Need more info on that.

The temperature bungs in the heads are a press fit into the heads.  Switching out the cylinder head bungs from ¼” to 3/8” or vice-versa has not been a big deal.  Once the old bung has been removed and the existing hole has been both cleaned and checked for pitting, the hole and bung are coated with Permatex #2 or other suitable sealer.  The new bung is then tapped into place.  You do want to make sure that the bung is installed with the wide portion of the threads facing the outside of the engine.

While a reducing bushing works great for using a ¼” sending unit in a 3/8” NPT threaded hole, going the other direction can be problematic in getting the larger diameter probe of the early model 3/8” sending unit to fit in the ¼” male to 3/8” female brass adapter.  As has been brought up, if actually using that 'raised' probe for a temperature reading there is going to be some inaccuracy in the gauge due to the temp probe not being directly immersed in the coolant flow.
By 55blacktie - Last Year
Thanks, Ted.

Everything I've read states that you can't mix a 6v gauge with a 12v sender. If I install a 57 sender in the G head, I will also have to replace the gauge. I've already stated that the OEM gauge isn't particularly accurate, but I don't know if the reproduction gauge (probably made off-shore) is better/worse. 
By Ted - Last Year
55blacktie (2/18/2023)
Everything I've read states that you can't mix a 6v gauge with a 12v sender. If I install a 57 sender in the G head, I will also have to replace the gauge. I've already stated that the OEM gauge isn't particularly accurate, but I don't know if the reproduction gauge (probably made off-shore) is better/worse. 

It’s really more of a question of the ohms and not the voltage.  Just pick out a ¼” NPT temp sensor with approximately the same ohms and the voltage will not be a major deal if intent on using something comparable to the original sensor.

By 55blacktie - Last Year
By the way, Miker, when I saw IIRC, I thought you were addressing somebody else by mistake. I later searched "IIRC." At 68 years of age, I'm very much a 20th-Century man (If I Recall Correctly). 
By 55blacktie - Last Year
I went ahead and bought an adapter. What I hadn't realized is that the probe of the 55 3/8 NPT sender is the same diameter as the 1/4 NPT male end of the adapter. In other words, the 55 sender is too big. When I take the engine to Tim McMaster to be rebuilt, I will let him choose whether to tap the G head bushing for 3/8 NPT or replace the 1/4 NPT bushing with 3/8 NPT to accommodate the 55 sender. Fortunately, I was out just $6.00 for the adapter; it won't break the bank, but buying parts & tools that can't/won't be used adds up.
By miker - Last Year
Well I’m 73. I should probably be using “Iirc”, since that first “I” for “if” is the important part. LOL
By napaunderground - Last Year
I found that Dennis Carpenter parts has the bung for the later style, I ordered one instead of continuing on my endeavour of removing the one out of my stock heads. FWIW. 

https://www.dennis-carpenter.com/trucks/cooling-system/temperature-senders/b7a-10911-a-adaptor-temp-sender-p65

I also got a rebuild kit for my truck water pump supposedly. We'll see when it comes in what I really bought.
By 55blacktie - Last Year
Has anyone tried using a c-clamp to press the bung into the head? Now that the rust corrosion has been removed, maybe it will be easy to tap the replacement bung into place, but I'm thinking that pressing the bung into place might be safer.  


By paul2748 - Last Year
I had no problems tapping the bung into the head.  As I mentioned, the engine was in the car when I did it.  Don't bang on the bung, get a piece of pipe or solid bar around the diameter of the bung and tap on that.  That is what I did.  Used a very thin coat of RTV when I did it.  Just make sure it starts going in straight.

If you can get the correct angle on a press, it should be just as good.
By 55blacktie - Last Year
I'll try using a socket to tap the bung into place. Thanks. 
By miker - Last Year
I don’t remember it being a problem, but I might have put the bung in the freezer overnight. Or put the head on the bbq until it was medium rare. Heat and cold is what I always used on the brand x drive on balancers.
By 55blacktie - Last Year
I'll skip the bbq. I'm also wondering if it's a good idea to tap the bung after it's been in the freezer; might it chip/shatter?